Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20160006963

Code-to-Code Comparison, and Material Response Modeling of Stardust and MSL using PATO and FIAT

Omidy, Ali D.·Panerai, Francesco·Martin, Alexandre·Lachaud, Jean R.·Cozmuta, Ioana·Mansour, Nagi N.
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This report provides a code-to-code comparison between PATO, a recently developed high fidelity material response code, and FIAT, NASA's legacy code for ablation response modeling. The goal is to demonstrates that FIAT and PATO generate the same results when using the same models. Test cases of increasing complexity are used, from both arc-jet testing and flight experiment. When using the exact same physical models, material properties and boundary conditions, the two codes give results that are within 2% of errors. The minor discrepancy is attributed to the inclusion of the gas phase heat capacity (cp) in the energy equation in PATO, and not in FIAT.

Explore related subjects

ablative materialsaerothermochemistryheat shielding

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Omidy, Ali D., Panerai, Francesco, Martin, Alexandre, Lachaud, Jean R., Cozmuta, Ioana, Mansour, Nagi N.. 2015-06-01. Code-to-Code Comparison, and Material Response Modeling of Stardust and MSL using PATO and FIAT. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20160006963

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2019

Arc Jet Testing: A Short Course

This course will cover an overview of the Entry Systems and Technology Division (TS) at NASA Ames Research Center (ARC) and descriptions of the extensive arc jet testing complex managed within the branch. After a quick look at the Earth and Planetary Entry projects supported by TS, along with the inventions and software developed within the division, a description of the entry environments to which thermal protection systems (TPS) are exposed will be discussed. The question of "How do we insure TPS survival?" will be answered with descriptions of the various test facilities across the agency and beyond and their applicability. The Ames Arc Jet Complex will then be described, starting with how an arc heater works, adding in the associated infrastructure required to run an arc heater, and the capabilities of each of the test tunnels. Finally, examples of TPS test articles will round out the course.

ablative materials↗
NASA NTRS2012

Performance of Conformable Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator in Aerothermal Environments

Conformable Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator, a cousin of Phenolic Impregnated Carbon Ablator (PICA), was developed at NASA Ames Research Center as a lightweight thermal protection system under the Fundamental Aeronautics Program. PICA is made using a brittle carbon substrate, which has a very low strain to failure. Conformable PICA is made using a flexible carbon substrate, a felt in this case. The flexible felt significantly increases the strain to failure of the ablator. PICA is limited by its thermal mechanical properties. Future NASA missions will require heatshields that are more fracture resistant than PICA and, as a result, NASA Ames is working to improve PICA's performance by developing conformable PICA to meet these needs. Research efforts include tailoring the chemistry of conformable PICA with varying amounts of additives to enhance mechanical properties and testing them in aerothermal environments. This poster shows the performance of conformable PICA variants in arc jets tests. Some mechanical and thermal properties will also be presented.

ablative materials↗