Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20180002549

Active and Passive Radiative Transfer Modeling with Preferentially-Aligned Particles

Abstract

The fluid dynamics of falling hydrometeors often results in preferential orientations that can affect both the intensity and polarization of electromagnetic radiation. In order to properly interpret remote sensing observations of ice and snow, such alignments should be considered when constructing databases of scattering particles; however, the inclusion of aligned particles increases the complexity of the scattering data. To demonstrate the use of scattering properties of preferentially-aligned particles, millimeter-wave brightness temperatures and radar observables, including reflectivity and linear depolarization ratio, are modeled using the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS). The necessary scattering parameters for vector radiative transfer, particularly with respect to ARTS, are reviewed, and the exploitation of particle symmetries, as well as scattering reciprocity relationships, are detailed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Adams, Ian Stuart. 2017-06-28. Active and Passive Radiative Transfer Modeling with Preferentially-Aligned Particles. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180002549

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Radiative interaction of atmosphere and surface: write up with elements of code

In passive satellite remote sensing of the Earth, separation of the path radiance (atmosphere-only contribution) from the surface reflection remains a “significant challenge”. Recent literature names it among the gaps in radiative transfer (RT) topics that “require continued research in the near future”. The challenge comes from multiple reflections (bouncing) between the atmosphere and surface – radiative interaction. In this paper we use a known RT technique, the matrix-operator method (MOM), and a new modification of the monochromatic vector RT (vRT) code IPOL (Intensity and POLarization) to simulate the interaction of a plane-parallel atmosphere and a few widely used surface reflection models. Following the idea of the Green’s function method, IPOL no longer takes the surface model parameters on input. Instead, it provides the path radiance, and the atmospheric reflection and transmission matrices as output. Despite many RT codes use the MOM formalism, this output does not seem common. The surface reflection matrix is computed externally. Therefore, this paper extends the Green’s function atmospheric correction technique to the case of polarized light. Aiming clarity rather than performance, we explain in Python the structure of the surface matrices for the isotropic (Lambertian), directional unpolarized, and polarized ocean reflection models. We then combine these surface matrices and the precomputed IPOL output to get numerically accurate signal at the top of atmosphere (TOA) and test it vs. published benchmarks. Then, for each benchmark scenario we show how to get the surface from the TOA signal, i.e. perform the RT-based atmospheric correction.

radiative transfer↗

Simulation of Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence from 3D Canopies with the Dart Model

The potential of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to monitor photosynthesis and plant stress has attracted considerable interest in SIF remote sensing (RS). However, canopy SIF and RS observations are impacted by topography, vegetation three dimension (3D) structure, leaf orientation, non foliar elements (e.g., tree woody skeleton), ... Physically based downscaling of canopy SIF RS data to leaf-level (i.e., to leaf photosynthesis) requires 3D radiative transfer (RT) models simulating canopy SIF and its observation. These models are necessary to better exploit the potential of SIF, by linking leaf SIF and SIF in RS observations as a function of canopy 3D architecture and experimental configurations (sun and viewing directions, etc.). The Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model is a comprehensive 3D radiative transfer (RT) model for urban and natural landscapes. This paper presents its SIF modeling for vegetation simulated with facets, its validation with the SCOPE/mSCOPE 1D models, and its recent extension to SIF modelling for landscapes simulated with 3D turbid medium.

radiative transfer↗

Neural Network Reflectance Prediction Model for Both Open Ocean and Coastal Waters

Remote sensing of global ocean color is a valuable tool for understanding the ecology and biogeochemistry of the worlds oceans, and provides critical input to our knowledge of the global carbon cycle and the impacts of climate change. Ocean polarized reflectance contains information about the constituents of the upper ocean euphotic zone, such as colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), sediments, phytoplankton, and pollutants. In order to retrieve the information on these constituents, remote sensing algorithms typically rely on radiative transfer models to interpret water color or remote-sensing reflectance; however, this can be resource-prohibitive for operational use due to the extensive CPU time involved in radiative transfer solutions. In this work, we report a fast model based on machine learning techniques, called Neural Network Reflectance Prediction Model (NNRPM), which can be used to predict ocean bidirectional polarized reflectance given inherent optical properties of ocean waters. This supervised model is trained using a large volume of data derived from radiative transfer simulations for coupled atmosphere and ocean systems using the successive order of scattering technique (SOS-CAOS). The performance of the model is validated against another large independent test dataset generated from SOS-CAOS. The model is able to predict both polarized and unpolarized reflectances with an absolute error (AE) less than 0.004 for 99% of test cases. We have also shown that the degree of linear polarization (DoLP) for unpolarized incident light can be predicted with an AE less than 0.002 for 99% of test cases. In general, the simulation time of SOS-CAOS depends on optical depth, and required accuracy. When comparing the average speeds of the NNRPM against the SOS-CAOS model for the same parameters, we see that the NNRPM is able to predict the Ocean BRDF 6000 times faster than SOS-CAOS. Both ultraviolet and visible wavelengths are included in the model to help differentiate between dissolved organic material and chlorophyll in the study of the open ocean and the coastal zone. The incorporation of this model into the retrieval algorithm will make the retrieval process more efficient, and thus applicable for operational use with global satellite observations.

radiative transfer↗