Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20180004732

Model of Collaborative Trajectory Options Program Performance

Kulkarni, Deepak
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Adoption of Collaborative Trajectory Options Programs (CTOP) in airspace has been hampered by a lack of willingness of a majority of airlines to participate in CTOP as there is a lack of information about benefits of CTOP. At present, there are only selected airlines that are considering participating in CTOP. One open research question is how much benefit an airline get by making a decision to participate in CTOP. Another question is identifying situations in which CTOP is a better alternative to traditional TMIs. For effective use of CTOP, it would be useful to understand how different factors such as capacity and TOS participation influence CTOP performance. Therefore, it would be helpful to develop a model of CTOP performance in terms of these factors.

Explore related subjects

CTOPData Analysis

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kulkarni, Deepak. 2018-07-01. Model of Collaborative Trajectory Options Program Performance. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180004732

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2018

Analysis of Impact of RTC Errors on CTOP Performance

Adoption of CTOPs in airspace has been hampered by a lack of willingness of a majority of airlines to participate in CTOP as there is significant cost in changing workflows and upgrading technology. No commercial vendors are currently offering TOS generation capability. Simpler, cheaper TOS generators may have more errors in RTC specification as compared to sophisticated TOS generators. This study investigates the impact of RTC errors on CTOP performance.

CTOP↗
NASA NTRS2018

Using an Automated Air Traffic Simulation Capability for a Parametric Study in Traffic Flow Management

Flight delays occur when demand for capacity-constrained airspace or airports exceeds predicted capacity. Demand for capacity-constrained airspace or airports can be controlled by a series of Traffic Management Initiatives (TMIs), which use departure and airborne delays, as well as pre-departure and airborne reroutes, to manage access to the constrained resources. Two systems exist in current and planned future operations to address imbalances between demand and capacity. The Collaborative Trajectory Options Program (CTOP) reduces demand to constrained resources by assigning strategic departure delay and pre-departure reroutes. Reroutes are selected from Trajectory Options Sets (TOSs) submitted by airlines. As flights approach the constrained resource, the Time-Based Flow Management System (TBFM) is used to assign tactical delay to satisfy constraints. This paper describes experiments performed to study the impact of varying levels of airline participation in CTOP via submission of TOSs on ground delay and flight time, and the impact of departure uncertainty on TBFM delays. Results suggest that as CTOP participation increases, average ground delays decrease for all airlines, but to the greatest extent for airlines participating in CTOP. A threshold in CTOP participation, which varies with the constraint capacity, is identified beyond which there is relatively little further reduction in average ground delays. Similarly, given the likely level of CTOP participation, the capacity reduction for which CTOP would be an appropriate TMI is also identified. Results also suggest that high average departure errors and high variability in departure error can make the prioritization of TBFM internal departures in TBFM metering and scheduling infeasible. Departure errors at current levels are, however, acceptable.

CTOP↗