Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20205007409

Large Scale and Multi-Alloy Rocket Engine Component Development using Various Metal Additive Manufacturing Techniques

Abstract

The NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) has been involved with various forms of metallic additive manufacturing (AM) for use in liquid rocket engine component design, development, and testing since 2010. These AM techniques have been demonstrated to significantly reduce hardware cost, shorten fabrication schedules, increase reliability by reducing the number of joints, and improve hardware performance by allowing fabrication of designs not feasible by conventional means. The focus at the NASA MSFC for these metal additive manufacturing techniques include laser powder-bed fusion (L-PBF), blown powder directed energy deposition (DED), arc-based deposition, and Laser Wire Direct Closeout (LWDC). A variety of components have been evaluated and tested including thrust chamber injectors, injector components such as faceplates, regeneratively-cooled combustion chambers, regeneratively-cooled nozzles, gas generator and preburner hardware, and augmented spark igniters. To support these component applications in harsh environments, NASA has advanced a variety of “standard” additive manufacturing alloys such as those in the superalloy-family and also evolved new alloys including GRCop-84, GRCop-42, NASA HR-1, and JBK-75. The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the various component programs at the NASA MSFC using AM to develop, fabricate, and test combustion devices hardware and the evolution of the new additive alloys. One of these projects that will be highlighted is Rapid Analysis and Manufacturing Propulsion Technology (RAMPT), which includes new process development for large scale AM components, multi-metallic AM components, including unique component designs using additive manufacturing. Additional information will be provided on the development of other components, hot-fire testing, post-processing of AM techniques including surface enhancements (polishing) techniques, material and process characterization, future development programs, and dissemination of data to industry partners.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Paul Gradl, Chris Protz, John Fikes, David Ellis, Laura Evans. Large Scale and Multi-Alloy Rocket Engine Component Development using Various Metal Additive Manufacturing Techniques. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20205007409

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Mechanical behaviour of additively manufactured metals

Additive manufacturing is reshaping the production of engineering components in diverse industries, such as the automotive, aerospace, defense, and biomedical sectors, by offering unprecedented design flexibility. The non-equilibrium processing conditions of additive manufacturing generate materials with unique microstructures and tailored mechanical properties that are often unattainable through conventional routes. This review focuses on recent advances in additively manufactured metals that demonstrate distinctive mechanical behaviors, including strength-ductility synergy, microstresses and gradient plasticity, fracture and fatigue resistance, and high-temperature creep performance. Here, we examine the mechanisms and micromechanical effects arising from the heterogeneous microstructures fabricated by additive manufacturing, to guide the design of a wide range of high-performance structural materials. Furthermore, we discuss critical research needs and emerging opportunities in process control, alloy design, advanced characterization, high-fidelity computational modeling, and machine learning aimed at achieving exceptional mechanical properties in additively manufactured metals.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Additively-manufactured Al-0.3Zr-0.2Ce-0.2Cu alloy with high creep resistance and electrical conductivity

Here, a new, solute-lean Al-0.3Zr-0.2Ce-0.2Cu (wt.%) alloy is developed for additive manufacturing that overcomes the classical tradeoff between conductivity and creep resistance. The rapid-cooling-enabled supersaturation of Zr, and its uniform distribution in α-Al matrix, along with formation of submicron (Ce,Cu)-rich intermetallic particles on solidification lead to unusually high creep resistance at 200 °C. Near-zero secondary creep rates are achieved up to the alloy yield stress (YS) of 65 MPa at 200 °C in as-fabricated state. The Zr-solute-induced dislocation-climb suppression mechanism underlying this improvement also restricts dynamic recovery above YS, as noted from appreciable primary creep and its transitioning to near-zero secondary creep rates. A combination of relatively coarse, epitaxially-grown α-Al grains, low Zr concentration in α-Al, and the impurity-scavenging effect of Ce to purify α-Al matrix produces high electrical conductivity of ∼48 %IACS. Aging precipitation of L1 2 -Al 3 Zr nanoprecipitates doubles the YS (to ∼150 MPa) at room temperature and increases alloy conductivity to ∼58 %IACS, but loss of solid-solution Zr out of α-Al matrix leads to activation of dislocation climb, degrading the creep properties as compared to the supersaturated Al-Zr solid solution in the as-fabricated state. Compared to L1 2 -Al 3 Zr nanoprecipitates, submicron (Ce,Cu)-rich particles formed on solidification are more effective at impeding dislocation climb, producing a threshold stress for dislocation creep of ∼ 50 MPa at 200 °C. The new alloy design concepts, especially solute-induced dislocation-climb suppression for creep resistance, explored here may pave way for the design of new metallic alloys for thermal/electrical conductors and other high-temperature applications.

Additive Manufacturing↗

Operational resilience of additively manufactured parts to stealthy cyberphysical attacks using geometric and process digital twins

Cyberphysical attacks on the digital backbone of Additive Manufacturing (AM) can compromise the printed part’s functionality. They can alter features in the digital geometry to introduce geometric defects (e.g., missing fillets) or alter process parameters to create local defects (e.g., voids). Addressing the downtime, waste, and quality deterioration associated with existing solutions requires operational resilience, i.e., rapid elimination or disruption of defect formation (to retain part function) without production stoppage or part disposal (to retain yield). This need is unmet due to the inherently unpredictable nature of attack-induced alterations, lack of access to the original geometric model for identification of altered geometric features, and in-process imposition of unknown process dynamics via attack-driven alteration of real-time-uncontrolled (or exogenous) parameters. This work establishes the above-mentioned operational resilience for the first time by creating two Digital Twins (DT). The Geometric DT (Geo-DT) is based on a unique physical-field-driven soft sensor and topology optimization method. The Process Digital Twin (Pro-DT) combines local defect quantification with a novel Reinforcement Learning formulation and training method. The importance of these methodological advances and the scalability of our approach are examined on a real AM testbed. It is shown that Geo-DT can correct geometric defects without access to the original digital geometry or explicit knowledge of attack-altered geometric features. Further, Pro-DT can accelerate real-time disruption of local defects despite attack-driven imposition of unknown process dynamics. We discuss how our framework goes beyond the contemporary focus on pre-attack security and in-attack detection towards resilience for AM and beyond.

Additive Manufacturing↗