Recent Progress in Liner Modeling (with a brief Liner Research Overview)

This study examines several perforate facesheet impedance prediction models. Each model is validated with impedances educed from acoustic pressure measurements acquired in the NASA Langley Research Center Normal Incidence Tube (NIT) and Grazing Flow Impedance Tube (GFIT). This measurement dataset includes results for 73 NIT samples acquired at sound pressure levels of 100, 120, and 140 dB, and for 9 GFIT samples acquired at SPLs of 120 and 140 dB and at mean flow speeds of Mach 0.0, 0.3, and 0.5. Multiple metrics are evaluated based on different potential applications of the selected perforate facesheet model. An optimizer is then used to modify one of these models to more accurately match the full measurement dataset.

acoustic↗

NASA NTRS2023

Partition Thickness Considerations for Additively Manufactured Acoustic Liners

Three types of uniform-depth liners are evaluated to explore the effects of partition thickness on the surface impedance achieved with additively manufactured liners. A transmission line code is used to predict the effects of sound transmission through empty chambers and wire mesh facesheets, and is combined with the Motsinger and Kraft model to account for sound transmission through perforated facesheets. The inclusion of partitions causes a blockage effect, i.e., a portion of the surface is ‘blocked’ (nonactive surface). For liners with no facesheet, these blockage effects are incorporated simply by accounting for the change in cross sectional area between the individual chamber and the unit cell that includes half of a partition thickness around the perimeter of this chamber. Comparison of impedances predicted in this manner with data acquired in the NASA Langley Normal Incidence Tube (NIT) confirms the efficacy of this modeling approach. Two approaches are considered to account for the inclusion of a wiremesh or perforated plate facesheet on these same cores. The first accounts for the effects of partition thickness before including the transfer impedance across the facesheet, while the second reverses these steps. A comparison of data acquired in the NASA NIT with modeled impedances suggests the first approach is best when the facesheet is a wire mesh, but the second approach is preferred when a perforated plate facesheet is used. It is hypothesized that this is due to the fact that a lumped element model is used to compute the transfer impedance across a wire mesh, while the corresponding transfer impedance across a perforated sheet explicitly incorporates the efffects of the liner core. However, comparisons of data acquired in the NASA Langley Grazing Flow Impedance Tube with modeled impedances seem slightly better when the first approach is employed with a perforated plate facesheet. Thus, the effects of partition thickness on liners with perforated sheets subjected to grazing incidence sound require further review

acoustic↗

DOE OSTI2022

Mooring Load Monitoring of a Wave Energy Converter Using a Self-Synchronizing Underwater Acoustic Network

A self-synchronizing underwater acoustic network, designed for remote monitoring of mooring loads in Wave Energy Converters (WEC), has been developed and tested. This network uses Time Division Multiple Access and operates self-contained with the ability for users to remotely transmit commands to the network as needed. Each node is a self-contained unit, consisting of a protocol adaptor board, an underwater acoustic modem and a battery pack. A node can be connected to a load cell, to a topside user or to the WEC. Every node is swapable. The protocol adaptor board, named Protocol Adaptor for Digital LOad Cell (PADLOC) supports a variety of digital load cell message formats (CAN, MODBUS, custom ASCII) and underwater acoustic modem serial formats. PADLOC enables topside users to connect to separate load cells through a user-specific command.

acoustic↗