Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20210010291

Plug20 Test Report

James E Bridges·Gary G Podboy·Mark P Wernet
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This report documents a test of aircraft exhaust nozzle designs applicable to commercial supersonic aircraft as envisioned in the 2025-2035 time frame. The test is primarily intended to provide data about the noise such aircraft would produce during landing and takeoff (LTO) operation, specifically the jet noise component of this noise. The tests were conducted at the NASA Glenn Research Center’s Aero-Acoustic Propulsion Laboratory in March 2020. The tests used the High-Flow Jet Exhaust Rig in the Nozzle Acoustic Test Rig which simulates the flow from a dual-stream turbofan engine in a flight stream. Seven exhaust configurations were tested with various combinations of internal mixer and external plug, and covered engine cycles having nozzle pressures from 1.5 to 2.3 at a flight speed of Mach 0.3. A few unheated flow conditions were also tested to tie results to other baseline test results. Data acquired and included in this report are 1) far-field acoustic spectra, 2) phased array measurements of noise source distributions, and 3) background-oriented schlieren of the flow near the nozzles. These data, along with the nozzle geometry in CAD format, are given as Appendices and are available online.

Explore related subjects

Jet noiseaeroacoustic testingsupersonic

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

James E Bridges, Gary G Podboy, Mark P Wernet. 2021-03-01. Plug20 Test Report. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210010291

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2017

Top-Mounted Propulsion Test Plans (TMP17)

NASA recently completed a study of propulsion cycles and nozzle types applicable to a 70-passenger, M1.6 supersonic airliner, paying especial attention to the noise produced during landing and take-off. The results of the study were validated in a model-scale test at NASA Glenn last summer. The findings of that study and test, along with other studies, have resulted in a new strategy for achieving the Commercial Supersonic Technologys goals for noise and performance. Key to that strategy is moving the propulsion to the top-side of the vehicle and modifying the nozzle and inlet to maximally shield the propulsion noise while maintaining efficient operation. Installed exhaust configurations have been designed to minimize the exhaust noise using new acoustic design tools. A test planned for the fall of 2017 will validate both the new design tools and the low-noise concept using a new translating phased array. During the test, questions regarding modifications of convected waves in the jet near-field that are key to new understandings of aft jet noise will be addressed. Also, to better tie rig results to real-world measurements, a model-scale version of a nozzle that was flight tested by Glenn Research Center in 2001 will be tested.

Jet noise↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Azimuthal Noise Directivity of Non-Axisymmetric Jets

Far-field acoustic measurements of subsonic non-axisymmetric jets were made to carefully show the azimuthal character of the sound field. Nozzles with azimuthal features having periodicity of 2 to 6 show the progression of the azimuthal effects. Compared with predicted velocity profiles, the relationship between jet thickness and sound is demonstrated. The measurements show that even jets with very radical non-axisymmetry, such as an 8:1 rectangular nozzle, produce an axisymmetric sound field at Strouhal numbers less than 1. Significant azimuthal deviations are found for St> 1, mainly at far aft angles. The polar angle where the sound begins to be non-axisymmetric moves aft as the azimuthal order increases. The deviation is more extreme in amplitude with increasing jet speed in subsonic jets. As the azimuthal order reaches m=5 the pattern becomes more complicated, with increases and decreases in the same azimuthal plane, but with relatively small amplitudes. It is hoped that the data can be used in validating high-fidelity jet noise prediction methods.

Jet noise↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Noise of Internally Mixed Exhaust Systems With External Plug For Supersonic Transport Applications

Internally mixed exhaust systems produce more noise than would be expected from an equivalent fully mixed flow. This ‘excess noise’ has never been fully explained and has not been researched recently as it is not as much of a problem for high bypass-ratio exhaust systems. Commercial supersonic vehicles, however, will use more moderate bypass ratio engines. Their exhaust systems will also likely feature external plugs to improve boat tail angle for cruise performance. Thus the problem of excess noise will need to be addressed along with the impacts of having an external plug. Recently, acoustic tests of dual-stream jet flows from both internal and external plug nozzles have been conducted. Measurements of noise from flows with an axisymmetric splitter and lobed forced mixer were made. These measurements show the baseline ‘excess noise’ previously found in forced mixer exhaust systems, and show how this noise source differs depending upon the plug geometry. Background-oriented schlieren measurements acquired simultaneously document the differences in shock structures over the transonic flow regime tested. The far-field acoustic measurements indicate that an external plug can slightly reduce the mixing noise of the jet plume when the flow is completely mixed, e.g. when the core and bypass streams have the same temperature and the flow is a single-stream jet. However, when the flow is not fully mixed, e.g. the usual case of an internally mixed exhaust system, the plug seems to amplify the ‘excess noise’ associated with the mixer. This additional noise source presents a challenge for nozzle designers wanting to use internally mixed exhaust systems with external plug nozzles.

Jet noise↗