Characterization of Chevron Nozzle Performance

Mark P Wernet; James E Bridges

Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20210020164

Characterization of Chevron Nozzle Performance

Mark P Wernet·James E Bridges

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The flow fields from a set of 50.8 mm diameter circular nozzles were characterized using both streamwise and cross-stream 3-component Stereo Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV). The test matrix of nozzles included 15 different chevron nozzle designs and one baseline, circularly symmetric nozzle. Nozzle jet operating conditions ranged from acoustic Mach numbers of 0.9 to 1.5, with static temperature ratios ranging between 0.84 and 2.7. Detailed surveys of the single jet flows were performed to capture three-dimensional features of the turbulent exhaust jet evolution. Cross-flow planar measurements were obtained at twelve axial locations, ranging from 0.1 to 20 nozzle diameters downstream of the nozzle exit planes. Streamwise measurements, along the jet centerlines, were obtained at ten partially overlapping downstream locations, providing complete axial surveys over a region extending beyond 20 nozzle diameters downstream of the nozzle exit planes. In both optical configurations, the measurement planes were sized to completely capture the fully turbulent jet shear layer growth. The measured three-dimensional mean and turbulent velocity fields, along with computed second order statistics including axial vorticity and turbulent kinetic energy, were evaluated for all test points. Well-defined streamwise vortex structures in the jet shear layers were measured and reported.

Explore related subjects

Jet Noise AeroAcoustics Particle Image Velocimetry

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Mark P Wernet, James E Bridges. 2021-09-24. Characterization of Chevron Nozzle Performance. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210020164

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2021

A History of Jet Noise Research at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

This paper reviews jet noise research conducted at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) from the early 1950s to the present day. Research conducted by NASA’s predecessor, the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA), and early years of NASA focused on turbojet noise, where a common approach for reducing jet noise was to limit the jet exit velocity to speeds that provided acceptable noise levels. Suppressors tested during this time resulted in thrust losses that were too severe to be implemented. With the introduction of turbofan engines in the 1960s, NASA shifted research to programs for both subsonic and supersonic aircraft applications with specific noise reduction goals. Subsonic research focused on increasing the bypass ratio of the engine to reduce the jet exit velocity of the core exhaust and adding mixers to the dual exhaust streams. Advances in computational methods improved aerodynamic designs and jet noise prediction tools. Supersonic applications proved to be more troublesome as programs aimed at large commercial transports required higher specific thrust engines. Changing the engine cycle to reduce jet noise was not compatible with mission range and speed requirements. Research for supersonic commercial aircraft remains an area of interest today at NASA.

Jet Noise↗

NASA NTRS2020

User's Guide for GAA_JET_FV (v1): A Jet Noise Prediction Code Based on the Generalized Acoustic Analogy

This document is a user’s guide for the jet noise prediction code GAA_JET_FV, which can be used to make predictions of turbulent mixing noise in high-speed free jets (ie. in the absence of any solid surfaces) of arbitrary cross section. The code requires a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solution for the mean flow and turbulence as input. A script is provided in the code package which can be used to interpolate structured or unstructured RANS solutions onto a structured grid suitable for the noise calculations. Output file formats for two commonly used RANS solvers are currently supported by this script. The document describes how the code can be obtained and installed on a user’s system. A simple test case is provided that can be run with minimal user knowledge of the code details. General instructions for running the interpolation script and the main code are given along with descriptions of the input and output data files and individual code modules. Several additional test cases are provided which allow the user to exercise additional features of the code. This document is Version 1, Revision 0 of the User’s Guide, which contains examples of round and non-axisymmetric unheated jet test cases. Future versions are planned which will include additional functionality for the code and more complex test cases.

Jet Noise↗

NASA NTRS2019

Perceived Noise Analysis for Offset Jets Applied to Commercial Supersonic Aircraft

A systems analysis was performed with experimental jet noise data, engineaircraft performance codes and aircraft noise prediction codes to assess takeoff noise levels and mission range for conceptual supersonic commercial aircraft. A parametric study was done to identify viable engine cycles that meet NASAs N+2 goals for noise and performance. Model scale data from offset jets was used as input to the aircraft noise prediction code to determine the expected sound levels for the lateral certification point where jet noise dominates over all other noise sources. The noise predictions were used to determine the optimal orientation of the offset nozzles to minimize the noise at the lateral microphone location. An alternative takeoff procedure called programmed lapse rate was evaluated for noise reduction benefits. Results show there are two types of engines that provide acceptable range performance; one is a standard mixed-flow turbofan with a single-stage fan, and the other is a three-stream variable-cycle engine with a multi-stage fan. The engine with a single-stage fan has a lower specific thrust and is 8 to 10 EPNdB quieter for takeoff. Offset nozzles reduce the noise directed toward the thicker side of the outer flow stream, but have less benefit as the core nozzle pressure ratio is reduced and the bypass-to-core area ratio increases. At the systems level for a three-engine N+2 aircraft with full throttle takeoff, there is a 1.4 EPNdB margin to Chapter 3 noise regulations predicted for the lateral certification point (assuming jet noise dominates). With a 10 reduction in thrust just after takeoff rotation, the margin increases to 5.5 EPNdB. Margins to Chapter 4 and Chapter 14 levels will depend on the cumulative split between the three certification points, but it appears that low specific thrust engines with a 10 reduction in thrust (programmed lapse rate) can come close to meeting Chapter 14 noise levels. Further noise reduction is possible with additional reduction in takeoff thrust using programmed lapse rate, but studies are needed to investigate the practical limits for safety and takeoff regulations.

Jet Noise↗