Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/NASA NTRS

NASA NTRS · 20210021306

Challenges, Considerations, and Opportunities for Exercise and Medical Accommodation Inside a Small Pressurized Rover

Robert L Howard·Harry L Litaker
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Pressurized Rovers (PR) can enable crew to explore away from a lander or surface habitat at distances not possible on foot or even in unpressurized rovers. Sustaining crew for multiple days, they can rove for weeks, independent of other surface elements. Because these are essentially mobile habitats, it is critical that they provide sufficient volume to accommodate the exercise and medical systems to maintain human health in remote, low gravity environments such as the Moon and Mars. This is an area of extensive unknowns as requirements have not yet been developed for exercise or medical systems in pressurized rovers. Yet they must be considered in vehicle sizing studies as they are significant volume drivers, requiring allocation for stowed and deployed hardware inside the rover cabin. Previously flown spacecraft have allocated varying amounts of volume based on the expected crew mission and the state of the art in these systems. NASA-STD-3001 provides high-level requirements for standards of medical care and exercise capabilities. Crew injuries are possible both inside the cabin and on extravehicular activities (EVA), therefore requiring medical capability. Exercise countermeasures are needed to counteract the debilitating effects of lowered gravity. This may include both reconditioning following a lengthy microgravity transit as well as ongoing countermeasures against the effect of low surface gravity. The NASA reference concept for the PR dates back to the Constellation Program and prototypes have been extensively tested in NASA’s Desert Research and Technology Studies (DRATS) program as well as at the NASA Johnson Space Center. The PR cabin is designed to accommodate two crewmembers and is subdivided into a forward cockpit area and a main body for crew habitation. EVAs are accomplished by transitioning through suit ports in the aft bulkhead into spacesuits. While no exercise devices have been developed for the PR, some have been prototyped and demonstrated in DRATS analog missions. A cycle ergometer performed reasonably well in DRATS testing as an aerobic exercise device and recent analysis work has theorized that a combination aerobic and resistive device could be packaged into a form factor similar to the DRATS ergometer. It is therefore suitable for use as an initial volumetric placeholder. No sensorimotor devices have been considered for the PR to aid in adaptation to surface gravity. However, there are commercially available treadmills that at minimum represent examples of the type of exercise system that could potentially be used for such a purpose. A combination of field test data, analysis, and CAD modeling will be used to perform a first pass assessment of whether these exercise devices can be stowed and deployed within the PR. Medical inventories from the International Space Station will be used as a volume placeholder for the PR medical system. A configuration will be discussed for medical deployment, including positioning of caregiver, patient, and medical equipment / supplies.

Explore related subjects

Pressurized RoverExerciseMedicalCountermeasuresVolumeDRATS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Robert L Howard, Harry L Litaker. Challenges, Considerations, and Opportunities for Exercise and Medical Accommodation Inside a Small Pressurized Rover. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20210021306

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2020

Habitability Lessons Learned from Field Testing of a Small Pressurized Rover

From 2008 to 2010, the NASA Small Pressurized Rover was tested in the Arizona desert in anticipation of human lunar surface missions. These tests were multi-day mission simulations with crew living in and conducting simulated lunar surface EVAs from the rover prototypes for 3, 7, or 14 days. This two-person surface spacecraft represents a departure from most previous lunar architectures, which either featured Apollo-class unpressurized rovers or large pressurized rovers – in some cases up to the scale of being considered mobile outposts. This paper will discuss the history of the Small Pressurized Rover, some of the values of field testing, the rover’s design evolution including the two prototypes tested in the field, key features and advantages of the SPR, the field test site location, the 2008, 2009, and 2010 field tests, habitability lessons learned from the testing, comparisons with follow-on laboratory/high bay testing, and recommendations for third generation rover design and flight vehicle development.

Pressurized Rover↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Habitability Considerations for a Notional Five-Day Small Pressurized Rover Excursion

Within the Artemis program, the Pressurized Rover (PR) is intended to support two-person mobile habitation up to roughly thirty days in duration. Lunar surface use of the PR, however, assumes a crew swap approximately halfway through a 33-day surface mission. Within that shorter duration, a rover crew may perform one or more excursions to remote sites in support of specific mission science or operational objectives. An important consideration in rover design is ensuring that the habitation accommodations in the vehicle support these types of missions. No pressurized rovers have ever been used in human spaceflight, but several have been proposed. The current NASA pressurized rover reference configuration is based on the third generation of the prototype small pressurized rover initially developed under Constellation. Using the NASA reference configuration, habitability considerations are discussed in the context of a notional five-day science excursion. The primary focus will be on the time the crew spends in the cabin, as opposed to time spent outside the vehicle on science-based EVAs. On each day of the excursion, the specific crew activities will be detailed. Crew activities that will be assessed include post sleep, EVA preparation, daily planning conference, private medical conference, traverse driving, EVA cabin egress, EVA cabin ingress, post-EVA activity, crew meals, pre-egress site observation and analysis, crew exercise, pre-sleep, and sleep. Considerations for crew fatigue will be discussed, including lessons learned from field testing. Finally, the assessment will identify hypotheses to assess in future analog missions and suitable test campaigns to evaluate them.

Pressurized Rover↗