Short-haul fatigue: A focus group study

Cassie J. Hilditch; Erin E. Flynn-Evans; Thomas Nesthus; Hannah M. Baumgartner; Lucica Arsintescu; Kevin B. Gregory; Nick G. Bathurst

NASA NTRS · 20220011142

Short-haul fatigue: A focus group study

Cassie J. Hilditch·Erin E. Flynn-Evans·Thomas Nesthus·Hannah M. Baumgartner·Lucica Arsintescu·Kevin B. Gregory·Nick G. Bathurst

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Researchers from NASA Ames Research Center, together with research scientists from CAMI, are preparing to conduct a study to evaluate fatigue during short-haul operations. In order to develop the scope of our study, we conducted a series of focus groups across multiple US airlines. Participants were recruited through emails distributed by airline safety teams and union representatives. We conducted 14 focus groups in early 2022 for a total of 90 participants across four airlines. Participants were asked to identify short-haul pairings and operations that they felt: a) elevated fatigue, b) were not fatiguing, and c) were important to study. Data were collected anonymously and coded using content analysis techniques to identify main themes. This analysis is ongoing.

Explore related subjects

short-haul fatigue focus group pilots

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Cassie J. Hilditch, Erin E. Flynn-Evans, Thomas Nesthus, Hannah M. Baumgartner, Lucica Arsintescu, Kevin B. Gregory, Nick G. Bathurst. Short-haul fatigue: A focus group study. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220011142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2022

Fatigue in Short-Haul Operations: Regulations and Research

Short-haul multi-segment flight operations are conducted within Part 117 table limits for Flight Time and Flight Duty Period, yet there are few data available regarding the impact on sleep, workload, and performance in these operations. The Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) has invested in the planning and execution of a study that will result in data characterizing the effects of short-haul multi-segment flight operations on cumulative sleep loss and pilot workload across trip pairings. Scientific researchers from CAMI, in collaboration with NASA Ames Research Center, are currently running an operational field study to examine the human factors and elements of pilot performance associated with short-haul multi-segment flight operations to better understand the impact of sleep disruption and workload across trip pairings. The first half of this presentation will provide a brief overview of current duty and rest requirements and identify gaps in current operational research data. The second half of the presentation will focus on results from a focus group study which developed the scope of the larger field study, followed by an overview of the current field study.

short-haul↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Pilot Workload is Associated with Long Duty Days and Multiple Flight Legs

Pilot workload is a real concern throughout aviation, especially in short-haul operations due to short flights and multiple flight legs. Our goal was to examine the workload experienced by pilots during normal operations in a short-haul airline. Thirty pilots flew a roster consisting of a cycle of five days of mid-day start time duty hours with many flight legs (baseline block) followed by four days off, five early start time duty hours followed by three days off, five mid-day time starts with many legs followed by three days off and then five early start time followed by one day off. The pilots provided evaluations of workload by scoring the six subscales of NASA-TLX (i.e., Mental Demand, Performance, Physical Demand, Effort, Temporal Demand, and Frustration) on their duty days during each flight and once during rest days. The analyses included the raw TLX scores for each demand, the mean raw TLX, and the overall weighted TLX mean for duty days and rest days. We found that mental demand was significantly lower for each duty schedule and rest relative to baseline (early start 1st block p = 0.016, late duty p = 0.017, early start 2nd block p < 0.001, rest p < 0.001). Temporal demand was significantly lower than baseline on early duty 1st block (p = 0.02), early start 2nd block (p < 0.001), and rest (p < 0.001). Effort was significantly lower than baseline only during early start 1st block (p = 0.014) and early start 2nd block (p < 0.001). Frustration was significantly lower during early start 2nd block relative to baseline (p = 0. 039). Physical demand and performance were higher relative to baseline during rest days (p < 0.001). Mean raw TLX showed significantly lower workload for early start 1st block (p = 0.011) and early start 2nd block (p < 0.001). The overall weighted TLX showed significantly lower workload for early start 1st block (p = 0.004), early start 2nd block (p < 0.001) and rest (p < 0.001). We found that pilots experienced higher workload on longer duty days with multiple flight legs. Pilots experienced lower mental demand, temporal demand, and effort on short duty days even though when their duty started earlier in the day. During days off pilots experienced higher physical demand and higher performance.

short-haul↗