Developing and Testing a Common Space Systems Ontology using the Ontological Modeling Language

Hamilton E. Johnson; L. Dale Thomas; Manuel J. Diaz

NASA NTRS · 20220015119

Developing and Testing a Common Space Systems Ontology using the Ontological Modeling Language

Hamilton E. Johnson·L. Dale Thomas·Manuel J. Diaz

Abstract

This paper describes the development and testing of the initial version of a common space systems ontology (CoSSO) for use by the Advanced Concepts Office (ACO) at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center. The ontology provides a shared conceptualization of concepts of interest to the ACO for modeling aerospace systems concepts in a pre-phase A context to aid with the transition to a more model-based paradigm. The ontological concepts and relations, as well as the anticipated use cases, were developed through interactions with the relevant subject matter experts at the ACO and implemented in the Ontological Modeling Language (OML). The ontology builds on the Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) and the Common Core Ontologies (CCO). While most of the ontology is still in the initial stages, an Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) ontology is being built on top of the main CoSSO and heavily developed as a proof of concept. The ECLSS ontology is designed with different use cases in mind, namely predicting and diagnosing errors in ECLS systems on long-duration missions, with a focus on the Four-Bed CO$_2$ carbon dioxide scrubber currently on board the ISS. The ECLSS ontology is being developed in a similar manner to the CoSSO, and designed to be compatible with it. The current state of both ontologies is presented and discussed, along with plans for future development and testing.

Explore related subjects

Conceptual Design Ontology Modeling Languages space systems

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Hamilton E. Johnson, L. Dale Thomas, Manuel J. Diaz. Developing and Testing a Common Space Systems Ontology using the Ontological Modeling Language. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20220015119

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2017

Tiltrotor Conceptual Design

This year end progress report summarizes our engineering study of a large, VTOL civil transport that we began in August 2015. The task has been to follow up on work reported in Reference 1, which described a NASA, 2005 design study showing that a 120 passenger, tiltrotor aircraft capable of cruising at 350 knots at 30,000 feet was quite feasible. The objective of our task this year has been to investigate the feasibility of a 120 passenger, tiltrotor aircraft capable of cruising at 425 to 450 knots at altitude and having VSTOL capability at Denver (i.e., 5,000 feet) with an outside air temperature (OAT) of 95°F. A corollary to our work has been to examine the suitability of the engineering tools available to conduct the concept design study we have begun. We have relegated two key pieces of corollary work to an appendix and used the body of this report to transmit progress in our preliminary performance trend studies. By way of background, in January of 2016, Mr. Harris presented a paper titled The VSTOL Performance Gap at the AHS Technical Meeting on Aeromechanics Design for Vertical Lift. This presentation is included in this year end report as Appendix A. A key concluding chart in that presentation is repeated here as Fig. 1. The Rotorcraft Branch at NASA Ames was already studying a tiltrotor suited for the regional carrier routes, but no effort beyond the 2005 results reported in Ref. 1 was going on. Therefore, we took on the task of extending the 350 knot, 120 passenger tiltrotor studies up to speeds associated with major airline routes.

Conceptual Design↗

NASA NTRS2017

Design and Control of an Experimental Tilt-Wing Aircraft

In this project, work has been done in the field of conceptual design of experimental tiltrotors. The main tools that have been used are NDARC (NASA Design and Analysis of Rotorcraft) and SIMPLI-FLYD. NDARC is a conceptual design tool for rotorcraft, and it is used to find trim points under various flight conditions. SIMPLI-FLYD is an integrated collection of software tools that enables a flight dynamics and control assessment of the rotorcraft vehicle design generated from NDARC. Two different tiltrotors have been investigated. Initially, work was done with the Bell XV- 15 tiltrotor. NDARCs ability to correctly model the tiltwing transition between airplane mode and hover mode was looked into. In addition, data from old flight tests were compared to the NDARC output, to see how accurately performance could be predicted. After the XV-15 analysis, an NDRARC model of a novel tiltwing concept from Elytron Aircraft was written and analyzed together with SIMPLI-FLYD. Elytron 2S is an experimental tiltwing aircraft, consisting of a joined-wing design with a small central wing for the proprotor. An alternative approach to hover control is used, where the typical rotor hub and swash plate are substituted for linear actuators controlling pitch, yaw and roll. The objective with the analysis of Elytron is to obtain a more complete understanding of the maneuverability and possible performance of this alternative aircraft configuration.

Conceptual Design↗

NASA NTRS2015

Conceptual Design of Environmentally Friendly Rotorcraft - A Comparison of NASA and ONERA Approaches

In 2011, a task was initiated under the US-French Project Agreement on rotorcraft studies to collaborate on design methodologies for environmentally friendly rotorcraft. This paper summarizes the efforts of that collaboration. The French and US aerospace agencies, ONERA and NASA, have their own software toolsets and approaches to rotorcraft design. The first step of this research effort was to understand how rotorcraft impact the environment, with the initial focus on air pollution. Second, similar baseline helicopters were developed for a passenger transport mission, using NASA and ONERA rotorcraft design software tools. Comparisons were made between the designs generated by the two tools. Finally, rotorcraft designs were generated targeting reduced environmental impact. The results show that a rotorcraft design that targets reduced environmental impact can be significantly different than one that targets traditional cost drivers, such as fuel burn and empty weight.

Conceptual Design↗