Search NASA⌕ Search

NASA NTRS · 20230001996

Automated Registration of Multi-Mode Nondestructive Evaluation Data

Abstract

Registration techniques play a central role in applications of image processing to computer vision, medical imaging, and automatic target tracking. Feature-based techniques such as scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) and speeded up robust features (SURF) are commonly used to register images derived from a single modality. However, SIFT and SURF struggle to register images from different modalities because the features tend to manifest rather differently and at sometimes very different length-scales. The most successful methods that have been developed to register multi-modal data use information-theoretic approaches. These methods play a key part in nondestructive evaluation scenarios where data that is collected by sensors of different modalities must be registered to be fused. In this paper, automated registration based on normalized mutual information is applied to align data derived from ultrasonic and radiographic inspections of (i) additively manufactured titanium alloy test coupons, and (ii) thin, lithium metal pouch-cell batteries. The quality of the registration is quantified in terms of computational resources and spatial accuracy. In the first case the X-ray computed tomography (XCT) data is captured on a region corresponding to a small subset of the ultrasonic data, while in the case of the lithium batteries the digital radiography (DR) captures a larger region of interest than the ultrasonic data. In both cases the radiographic data resolution is much higher than for ultrasound, but interestingly, in both cases the accuracy of the registration is approximately equal to two-to-three-pixel lengths in the ultrasonic images.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Peter W Spaeth, Erik L Frankforter, William C Schneck, Matthew R Webster, Matthew Godbold, Daniel F Perey. Automated Registration of Multi-Mode Nondestructive Evaluation Data. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230001996

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Material Inspectability Assessment Related to Lunar Construction Technology Development

For the building of lunar structures on the Moon using lunar regolith-based construction materials, ensuring their structural integrity and employing methods optimal for such tasks is crucial. In this technical memorandum (TM) the detectability of simulated void defects in a cementitious-based lunar construction material is compared between different nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods, especially methods which have potential to be developed into space qualified instruments. Primarily, simulated voids, introduced during fabrication as foam spheres, were used for this evaluation. Furthermore, smaller, unintended void defects were used to assess the detectability. The results highlights trade-offs between the NDE methods in terms of detection limit, correct size indication, penetration depth, and potential for reduction in size, weight, and power (SWaP).

Nondestructive Evaluation↗

Thermal Inspection of a Composite Fuselage Section Using theMethod of Proper Generalized Decomposition

Proper Generalized Decomposition (PGD) is a reduced order modeling technique for the simulation of physical systems whose governing equations depend on boundary conditions, initial conditions, material properties, and geometric parameters. It uses separated representations of system covariates combined with an iterative approximation method known as successive enrichment in order to compute an accurate parameter-dependent approximation to the full governing equations. PGD can also be used as an alternative to the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) of a matrix and therefore as an alternative to PCA thermography. In this paper PGD was used to analyze data derived from the inspection of a composite fuselage forward section using flash thermography, and the results were compared against the standard PCA approach.

Nondestructive Evaluation↗

NDE Methods and Capabilities Handbook - Resources for the Composites NDE Community

Composite structures are often difficult to inspect due to the anisotropic nature of the material systems and the range of flaws and defects that can arise in the manufacturing process. NASA’s Advanced Composites Project, a public-private partnership between government, universities and industry, sought to address improved methods, tools, and protocols to reduce the development and certification timeline for composite materials and structures. The rapid inspection of composites was one of the three focused research areas of the project. One deliverable of the project was to develop an NDE Methods and Capabilities Handbook. This Handbook provides a publicly available guidance document that facilitates the selection of appropriate NDE techniques and provides recommended protocols for detecting and characterizing common flaw types in solid laminate carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite (CFRP) structures. The Handbook seeks to reduce the time required to develop qualified inspection processes for composite aircraft structures during the development, certification, and manufacturing phases by providing a reference that helps minimize trial and error and provides guidance on best practices, techniques, and settings, for specific flaw types and geometries. Techniques include, but are not limited to ultrasound, laser based ultrasound, infrared thermography, and x-ray CT. Flaw types include, but are not limited to porosity, delaminations, voids, Automated Fiber Placement (AFP) defects and impact damage. The Handbook contains details such as inspection parameters, data analysis techniques, inspection efficiency and limitations. This presentation will describe key Handbook activities with examples of the techniques and flaw types examined by the Advanced Composite Consortium members. Availability to the NDE community of the fabricated NDE standards as well as the raw data collected on the standards by the Consortium members is discussed.

Nondestructive Evaluation↗