Comparison Between DSMC and CFD for Hypersonic Planetary Entry Simulations

Arnaud Borner; Dinesh Prabhu; Brett Cruden

NASA NTRS · 20230013741

Comparison Between DSMC and CFD for Hypersonic Planetary Entry Simulations

Arnaud Borner·Dinesh Prabhu·Brett Cruden

Abstract

Hypersonic planetary entry flows span a wide range of Knudsen numbers between rarefied and continuum flows. While computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques cannot provide an accurate solution for flows in the rarefied regime, the direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method is capable of providing accurate solutions for flows in both in the rarefied and continuum regimes but becomes prohibitively expensive as the Knudsen number decreases. For the purpose of thermal protection systems (TPS) design and post-flight reconstruction, various selected points along an entry trajectory are often solved using hypersonic solvers. The quantities of interest that are obtained from that exercise are generally surface quantities, such as pressure, heat flux and enthalpy. Then, material response solvers are used to either design the heat shield to an optimal thickness based on a choice of material, or to provide in-depth heating profiles through the material at various select locations, and compare with flight instrumentation such as the ones that flew on NASA’s two most recent Mars missions, MSL and Mars2020. While most of the heating is generally experienced during the continuum part of the entry, the heating within the rarefied regime is significant for some atmospheres, and hence the flow solutions need to be computed using the DSMC method. Ensuring consistency between hypersonic CFD and the DSMC is crucial so that reliable surface quantities can be passed to material response solvers. Studies were performed to compare the two methods at various select locations, for both non-reacting argon flows as well reacting CO2/N2 flows. Preliminary conclusions show that, for non-reacting flows, the agreement between the two methods for surface heating is excellent (within expected uncertainties) for a freestream Knudsen number of 0.0006, and gets progressively worse as the Knudsen number increases to 0.06. Continuum breakdown analyses were performed and showed that, in general, the Gradient Length Local Knudsen number (KnGLL) from Boyd and associated criterion (KnGLL > 0.05) seems conservative in predicting zones of breakdown in the flow, and associated errors for surface quantities. Updated criteria of KnGLL = 2.0 and 0.5 appear to be more appropriate for surface and flow quantities, respectively. Furthermore, when studying reacting flows, our studies showed that while flow quantities are highly dependent on relaxation parameters and chemistry rates, it is possible to obtain a good agreement for surface heating, as long as the continuum breakdown is minimal.

Explore related subjects

DSMC CFD continuum breakdown Mars

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Arnaud Borner, Dinesh Prabhu, Brett Cruden. Comparison Between DSMC and CFD for Hypersonic Planetary Entry Simulations. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20230013741

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2024

Efficient particle control in systems with large density gradients

Simulations of large density gradients present a number of challenges for direct Monte Carlo methods, since they lead to too few particles in dilute regions and prohibitively many in the dense regions. Here, we propose a particle control methodology that gives the user more control of the number of particles per cell by introducing a variable weight for each particle. The proposed scheme is based on the stochastic weighted particle method, requires only small modifications to DSMC, and exactly conserves mass, momentum, and energy. In validation tests of systems with density ratios of order 102-104, we observe 101-102 times less variance in the dilute region compared to a DSMC solution with the same number of system particles, while introducing a moderate additional computational cost.

DSMC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Application of OpenFOAM to Plume Impingement in Space Environments

After 30 years of continuous human presence in low-earth orbit, NASA is returning to the moon and eventually will go to Mars. Travelling beyond low earth orbit requires NASA to learn how humans can live in Deep Space environments – beyond the protection of Earth’s magnetosphere and at distances from Earth that prevent a quick return in case of trouble. To this end, NASA is constructing the Lunar Gateway, an ISS-like space station to be put in orbit around the moon to act as a home base for Lunar exploration for NASA astronauts. The Gateway Lunar outpost will be built incrementally, via modules which will arrive at separate times and dock to the existing structure. The incremental addition of Gateway modules, and the docking of visiting vehicles, is achieved via a sequence of firings from the approaching body’s onboard reaction control system (RCS) thrusters to achieve the required approach trajectory. The typical hypergolic chemical RCS thrusters work by firing hot gases to produce adverse thrust and the needed change in velocity to safely finish the docking process. The exhaust gas from the RCS thrusters form plumes that expand into the vacuum of space and can impinge onto the outer surfaces of the Lunar Gateway, causing unwanted forces and moments, heat loads, sediment deposition, and in extreme cases, even surface erosion - all mechanisms that can damage the Lunar Gateway and must be minimized. Both permanent and visiting modules will have this RCS thruster exhaust impingement problem. This research aims to establish existing OpenFOAM solvers as a methodology for improving simulation techniques of rocket exhaust plume impingement in space environments. The flow structure of a plume in a space environment is complex; a plume that originates from a hypergolic chemical RCS thruster and expands into a vacuum will experience several regimes of rarefication. This range includes the continuum flow in the rocket nozzle through the fully rarefied free molecular flow further from the nozzle. The flow physics is different at these two extremes, and as such, the simulation approach for plumes is generally divided into a traditional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation in and near the nozzle which is coupled to a subsequent direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) simulation. At this time, the scope of this research is developing, verifying, and validating a method using existing solvers in the OpenFOAM framework for performing coupled CFD/DSMC calculations to determine the extent of plume impingement loading on generic space structures. This presentation will detail code-to-code comparisons between the hyStrath dsmcFoam+ solver, developed using OpenFOAM and available as open-source, and NASA’s in-house DSMC Analysis Code (DAC). Comparisons to several open-source publication findings using DAC [3,4] are presented, and advantages of using an OpenFOAM based solver are also discussed. The presentation concludes with a discussion of future work, and a plan for coupling the dsmcFoam+ solver with CFD simulations of chemical rocket engines for unified coupled plume simulation.

DSMC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Implementation of active sites to capture pitting of oxidizing carbon materials in DSMC.

In this work we demonstrate a newly developed capability to capture pitting of carbon fibers in DSMC simulations, specifically using the Stochastic PArallel Rarefied-gas Time-accurate Analyzer (SPARTA) code [1]. State-of-the-art reactive surface models in DSMC compute collision dependent carbon consumption rates (usually through desorption of CO) based on a set of surface reactions that has been derived from molecular beam experiments [2]. The reactivity on each carbon surface element is constant in those models, such that the carbon surface recedes uniformly as a result of ablation. However, it is well known that in reality the carbon surface has locally different reaction rates due to the presence of defects at the atomic scale [3]. These defective sites have a much higher reactivity than the average sites (2-3 orders of magnitude) and are first to react during ablation leading to its removal. This causes all the neighboring atoms to be defective and increase their reactivity, thus leading to the localized carbon removal around these ”active” sites (as shown in Fig. 1). In this manner, these highly reactive defective sites serve as nucleation sites for the formation and growth of etch pits with potentially detrimental effects on the structural integrity. Recently a detailed surface chemistry framework was developed in SPARTA, capable of incorporating various reaction mechanisms such as adsorption, desorption, Eley-Rideal (ER) and Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH) mechanisms [4]. Within this framework, we have implemented the capability of a single surface having multiple site sets with different reactivities. Using this feature, we can simulate the presence of active sites on carbon surfaces, whose reactivity is much greater than an average site as a result of defects. We have implemented the active site fraction as a property of surface elements within SPARTA, which is directly proportional to the local reactivity of each surface element. By introducing an initial distribution of the active site fraction across the carbon surface, and propagating it in a manner that mimics the evolution of real reacting carbon surfaces, we are able to capture the formation and growth of etch pits as a result of surface consumption reactions such as oxidation.

DSMC↗