Tutorial: Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Approaches for Modeling and Electrical Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing

Joseph W Connolly; Joseph M Haglage; Santino J Bianco; Halle E Buescher; Jonathan L Kratz

NASA NTRS · 20240004147

Tutorial: Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Approaches for Modeling and Electrical Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing

Joseph W Connolly·Joseph M Haglage·Santino J Bianco·Halle E Buescher·Jonathan L Kratz

Abstract

This tutorial session outlines capabilities made available by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for testing electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) hardware and software prior to using turbomachinery. Removing these components from the experimentation process until necessary significantly reduces the development and testing costs and safety risks. Three facilities, the NASA Electric Aircraft Testbed (NEAT) and the Hybrid Propulsion Emulation Rig (HyPER) are unique facilities that provide the following capabilities: (i) the verification of megawatt-scale electrical and electromechanical system components at altitude, (ii) the verification of EAP control systems on sub-scale representative electromechanical architectures. The importance, operation, and specifications of each facility is described with detail. Provided examples of past testing showcase the abilities of each facility. Simple and complex methods for replicating the steady state and dynamical mechanical loading on the electrical power system are discussed

Explore related subjects

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Joseph W Connolly, Joseph M Haglage, Santino J Bianco, Halle E Buescher, Jonathan L Kratz. Tutorial: Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Approaches for Modeling and Electrical Hardware-in-the-Loop Testing. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240004147

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2025

Piloted Evaluation of a Fault Recovery System for an Aircraft with Distributed Electric Propulsion

Electrified aircraft powertrains contain multiple tightly coupled subsystems, making them much more complex than traditional aircraft propulsion systems, both in terms of integration and control. Electrification enables aircraft to have multiple distributed thrust-producing fans that the flight control system can utilize for enhanced maneuverability, further increasing the control complexity. The SUbsonic Single Aft eNgine (SUSAN) Electrofan is a NASA concept aircraft that leverages this technology. SUSAN is a series/parallel partial hybrid electric single-aisle transport aircraft that takes advantage of its electrified powertrain to provide fuel burn and emissions benefits when compared to the state-of-the-art. Achieving these benefits requires an appropriately designed control architecture that coordinates the various powertrain and flight control subsystems. As such, the SUSAN aircraft is designed with a high level of automation, allowing it to properly manage coupled subsystems and react rapidly to failures and anomalies. To do this effectively, algorithms that perform component health management, fault detection, isolation, and accommodation, and continuous optimization, must be developed, tested, validated, and implemented. This paper describes a piloted evaluation of such an algorithm in scenarios with multiple fan failures, performed in a flight simulator, demonstrating failure recovery and continued safe operation up to the limits of the powertrain. These scenarios are subsequently related to certification requirements.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗

NASA NTRS2024

Thermal Cycling of Stationary Superconducting Rotor Coils for the High Efficiency Megawatt Motor

The self-cooled, superconducting rotor included in the design of the High Efficiency Megawatt Motor (HEMM) can produce magnetic field strengths far higher than those produced using conventional approaches. However, the superconductivity properties of high-temperature superconducting coils can degrade as the coil is repeatedly thermally cycled, significantly impacting the HEMM’s performance. To explore ways to reduce this risk, NASA researchers fabricated and tested several coils of increasing complexity. The results of the testing campaign indicate that NASA can fabricate and test full-scale superconducting coils for the rotor of the HEMM that can reliably survive repeated thermal cycling with no or acceptably slow degradation.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗

NASA NTRS2024

Effect of High-Speed Rotation on High-Temperature Superconducting Coils for High Efficiency Megawatt Motor

The use of a superconducting rotor in the High Efficiency Megawatt Motor (HEMM) comes with a number of challenges. The HEMM’s rotor must be designed so that the superconducting coil can tolerate the forces it will encounter during operation. These forces introduce considerable risk to the design of the HEMM. Because this risk cannot be adequately addressed through refined analysis, a set of experiments was deemed necessary to demonstrate that the HEMM’s superconducting coils can survive the stresses imparted by the centrifugal forces acting on the coil during full-speed operation of the machine. These experiments required spin testing a full-scale HEMM coil on a representative rotor structure at room temperature and sequentially higher rotation speeds and measuring the superconductivity response of the coil in liquid nitrogen (LN2) before and after each spin test. Tests were carried out to the full centripetal loading of a recent HEMM design. According to finite element analysis, this load produced stress components in the coil that exceed their design limit by a factor of 1 to 7.4. Although not yet confirmed, the current HEMM design is expected to produce even smaller stresses in the coil due to a 20 percent reduction in the coil’s mass and an increased volume of structural material. The only degradation of the coil that occurred during this testing resulted from a test rig failure and from the voltage taps, which are not part of the final coil design.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗