Tutorial on LuNaMaps Developed Tools andProcesses for Mapping the Lunar Surface

Andrew Liounis; Chris Gnam; Erwan Matias Mazarico; Michael Kenneth Barker; Noah Edward Petro; Jacob Armstrong Richardson; Stephen Scheidt; Stefano Bertone; Ross A Beyer

NASA NTRS · 20240012330

Tutorial on LuNaMaps Developed Tools andProcesses for Mapping the Lunar Surface

Andrew Liounis·Chris Gnam·Erwan Matias Mazarico·Michael Kenneth Barker·Noah Edward Petro·Jacob Armstrong Richardson·Stephen Scheidt·Stefano Bertone·Ross A Beyer

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The main contribution of this project is the combined knowledge of terrain relative navigation experts and lunar scientists who are familiar with both the lunar orbital imagery and the instruments that collected the data as well as how a TRN system utilizes map data. This knowledge comes in the form of published technical papers, benchmark map data sets, and software tools that can help others automate the process of creating the necessary maps for their own landing sites in the future. This presentation provides a brief overview of the tools and processes developed by the project.

Explore related subjects

optical navigation map validation terrain relative navigation shape from shading stereophotogrammetry

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Andrew Liounis, Chris Gnam, Erwan Matias Mazarico, Michael Kenneth Barker, Noah Edward Petro, Jacob Armstrong Richardson, Stephen Scheidt, Stefano Bertone, Ross A Beyer. Tutorial on LuNaMaps Developed Tools andProcesses for Mapping the Lunar Surface. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20240012330

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2024

Demonstration of the Orion Optical Navigation System on Artemis I

The Orion Optical Navigation (OpNav) System is a first-of-its-kind navigation capability that was demonstrated in space on the Artemis I mission. The OpNav System was tested under a variety of conditions, resulting in over one thousand images of Earth, Moon, and starfields. Pairing the images with ground tracking information, not only did Artemis I provide a basis to evaluate the performance of the Orion OpNav system, but produced a valuable set of imagery/data that can be used to further development and testing of other optical navigation systems.

optical navigation↗

NASA NTRS2016

Nanoradian Ground-Based Astrometry, Optical Navigation, and Artificial Reference Stars

Spacecraft carrying optical communication lasers can be treated as artificial stars, whose relative astrometry to Gaia reference stars provides spacecraft positions in the plane-of-sky for optical navigation. To be comparable to current Deep Space Network delta-Differential One-way Ranging measurements, thus sufficient for navigation, nanoradian optical astrometry is required. Here we describe our error budget, techniques for achieving nanoradian level ground-base astrometry, and preliminary results from a 1 m telescope. We discuss also how these spacecraft may serve as artificial reference stars for adaptive optics, high precision astrometry to detect exoplanets, and tying reference frames defined by radio and optical measurements.

optical navigation↗

NASA NTRS2016

High Precision Ranging and Range-Rate Measurements over Free-Space-Laser Communication Link

We present a high-precision ranging and range-rate measurement system via an optical-ranging or combined ranging-communication link. A complete bench-top optical communication system was built. It included a ground terminal and a space terminal. Ranging and range rate tests were conducted in two configurations. In the communication configuration with 622 data rate, we achieved a two-way range-rate error of 2 microns/s, or a modified Allan deviation of 9 x 10 (exp -15) with 10 second averaging time. Ranging and range-rate as a function of Bit Error Rate of the communication link is reported. They are not sensitive to the link error rate. In the single-frequency amplitude modulation mode, we report a two-way range rate error of 0.8 microns/s, or a modified Allan deviation of 2.6 x 10 (exp -15) with 10 second averaging time. We identified the major noise sources in the current system as the transmitter modulation injected noise and receiver electronics generated noise. A new improved system will be constructed to further improve the system performance for both operating modes.

optical navigation↗