Airfoil Table Generation Comparison Utilizing XFOIL and UNS2D Flow Solvers

Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared; Isaac Cavazos; Joseph Gabriel Estrada; Dalton Hall; Sarah Maadarani; Min Kaung Myat

NASA NTRS · 20250000680

Airfoil Table Generation Comparison Utilizing XFOIL and UNS2D Flow Solvers

Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared·Isaac Cavazos·Joseph Gabriel Estrada·Dalton Hall·Sarah Maadarani·Min Kaung Myat

Abstract

The flow solvers XFOIL and UNS2D were utilized within the airfoil table generator AFTGen to generate airfoil performance tables, and these results were compared to determine accuracy at low Mach numbers that may be relevant to Urban Air Mobiltiy (UAM) applications. Airfoil tables were generated for the NACA 0012 airfoil as well as a set of three asymmetrical airfoils developed in this study from which the rotor blade CSUS 001 was comprised. To determine which solver more accurately represented real-world aerodynamics, the airfoils were experimentally tested in the CSU 2-foot by 2-foot wind tunnel. The results of XFOIL and UNS2D were compared to the experimental results. It is important to note that due to differences in the Reynolds numbers between simulations and experimental testing, the magnitude of the section lift and drag coefficient varies between the two methods. However, observations on the accuracy of XFOIL and UNS2D could still be made based on the trends of the data. For the symmetrical NACA 0012 airfoil, it was found that XFOIL and UNS2D accurately predicted the trends of the section lift and drag coefficients. However, XFOIL predicted slightly lower section drag coefficients than UNS2D for the tested angles of attack. For the asymmetrical CSUS 001 airfoils, XFOIL could not predict a steady to decreasing section lift coefficient phenomenon at negative angles of attack observed in both the UNS2D and experimental results. Similarly, XFOIL was unable to predict an increased section drag coefficient at negative angles of attack for the CSUS 001 airfoils as observed in the UNS2D and experimental results. Additionally, 3D computational fluid dynamics was utilized through RotCFD to compare the performance of a rotor blade using the CSUS 001 airfoils versus a rotor blade using the NACA 0012 airfoil.

Explore related subjects

UAM UNS2D XFOIL Airfoil

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Gianmarco Sahragard-Monfared, Isaac Cavazos, Joseph Gabriel Estrada, Dalton Hall, Sarah Maadarani, Min Kaung Myat. Airfoil Table Generation Comparison Utilizing XFOIL and UNS2D Flow Solvers. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20250000680

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

NASA NTRS2024

High Level Architecture (HLA) as a Research Tool for Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

In this document, a NASA investigation into the High-Level Architecture (HLA) standard for distributed simulation as a means of furthering Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) research is illustrated along with a description of the evolution of distributed simulation leading to the HLA standard. HLA enables efficient definition and insertion of components and participants in simulation sessions. Novel concepts can be added or removed as the work evolves. A general history of the HLA standard is described to show past needs for improved methods of distributed simulation, particularly among participating laboratories in separate locations, as well as previous applications of HLA simulation to airspace research. These examples from the past illustrate how new and emerging concepts can be simulated by layering notional ideas over simulated current-day systems and capabilities in a controlled environment for examination. In the 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the MITRE Corporation performed joint research into then-emergent capabilities in the National Airspace System (NAS). In the early 2000s, the MITRE Corporation developed an open, extendable set of objects and protocols designed for global and collaborative aviation research called AviationSimNet, which has HLA as its foundation. This led to NASA and the FAA using AviationSimNet to connect laboratories for AAM research, resulting in the NASA/FAA Laboratory Integrated Test Environment (NFLITE). The underlying capabilities of HLA enabled testing a notional interaction between AAM and legacy ATC systems that resulted in AAM vehicles receiving beacon codes for identification on ATC screens in Class C airspace. The potential next steps in this work include defining and examining notional interactions between AAM and legacy ATC systems within Class B airspace.

UAM↗

NASA NTRS2024

Operational Integration Assessment (OIA) of Midterm UAM Operations: Class C Airspace Tabletop Exercise and Integration Checkpoint

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in collaboration with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), is conducting research into evolving today’s air traffic management system towards a more automated and operationally flexible airspace to accommodate Urban Air Mobility (UAM) operations at scale. UAM operations, enabled by electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) aircraft, may change the role of aviation in the movement of people and goods and provide practical, cost-effective air transport in metropolitan areas. FAA UAM Concept of Operations v2.0 describes three evolutionary stages of UAM operations: Initial, Midterm, and Mature State operations. Midterm operations are comprised of many complex changes to the national airspace system (NAS). The Operational Integration Assessment (OIA) was created as a capability to address the need to study the progression and identify interdependencies of those changes that may occur during the midterm UAM operations timeframe. The OIA includes a series of tabletop exercises and integration checkpoints planned to explore various use cases from end-to-end, evaluated by NASA’s Air Traffic Management eXploration (ATM-X) project in partnership with the FAA’s William J. Hughes Technical Center (WJHTC) and industry partners. The use cases were exercised in an immersive, integrated live-virtual-constructive (LVC) airspace simulation environment, called the NASA/FAA Laboratory Integrated Test Environment (NFLITE), as part of an effort to learn how UAM operations can scale beyond the as-is NAS and through the transition to higher-tempo and highly automated operations of the future. This document describes the events of the tabletop exercise held from January 24-26, 2023, at the National Airspace Research & Technology Park (NARTP) in Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey, adjacent to the WJHTC and the subsequent integration checkpoint performed on March 28, 2023,at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) in Hampton, Virginia.

UAM↗

NASA NTRS2023

ATM-X Urban Air Mobility: Assistive Detect and Avoid for UAM Operations Safety Evaluation Metrics

This document satisfies ATM-X UAM Task UID 989 “Evaluation Report on Tactical Separation Provision Services with Advisory Detect and Avoid Safety Metrics”. The first version of this document was delivered to the UAM team on October 3, 2022, for initial revision and comments.This current version incorporates all the comments received and is being delivered to the UAM subproject for a final revision before is submitted to satisfy the L1 milestone deliverable.

UAM↗