Search NASA⌕ Search
Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1054522

Advanced Anchoring Technology (Final Technical Report)

Meggitt, Dallas J.
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

It is generally conceded that the costs associated with current practices for the mooring, anchoring, or foundation systems of Marine HydroKinetic (MHK) and Deepwater Floating Wind systems are a disproportionate portion of the total cost of an installed system. Reducing the cost of the mooring and anchoring components for MHK systems can contribute substantially to reducing the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE).

Explore related subjects

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER17 WIND ENERGYAdvanced Anchoring TechnologyGrouted Marine Micropile Anchor

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Meggitt, Dallas J.. 2012-11-09. Advanced Anchoring Technology (Final Technical Report). https://doi.org/10.2172/1054522

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Applied Research and Development to Support Open-Water Testing at PacWave

This report presents the findings from Task 7 of the project, which focused on improving the performance and reliability of wave energy converters (WECs) under real-world conditions, particularly in the presence of marine growth (biofouling) and system faults. The work was conducted using the RM3 point absorber WEC model, a marine current turbine based on the SHARKS project model, and the WEC-Sim simulation platform, and it included both modeling and control system development.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗
DOE OSTI2026

Power performance and loads characterization of laboratory-scale cross-flow rotors fabricated using additive manufacturing

Tidal energy conversion is a relatively new application for additive manufacturing (AM), where the focus has been on fabricating axial-flow turbine blades. AM techniques add material precisely where it is needed, creating more complex shapes with less waste. Cross-flow rotor geometry presents an opportunity for AM to improve rotor performance by fabricating features that cannot be created economically via conventional manufacturing. The challenges associated with using AM in cross-flow design include water resistance and degradation over time while retaining a level of quality equivalent to conventionally machined parts. In this work, AM materials were tested by environmentally conditioning samples in a seawater tank for 5 months, followed by performance and phase-resolved load testing of laboratory-scale rotors in a hydraulic flume. We found that while metals like titanium and Inconel have excellent performance in marine environments, achieving the desired geometry and performance is difficult. Thermoplastics degraded in seawater but were easier to form into desired geometries and could exceed the performance of an aluminum control rotor. Warping and surface finish were significant detractors from AM rotor performance. These results suggest that the primary benefits of using AM for cross-flow rotors is to quickly fabricate and test unconventional rotor geometries.

16 TIDAL AND WAVE POWER↗