Standardizng Data

Baker, Nathan A; Klemm, Juli; Harper, Stacey; Gaheen, Sharon; Heiskanen, Mervi; Rocca-Serra, Philippe; Sansone, Susanna A

doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.12

Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1063695

Standardizng Data

Baker, Nathan A·Klemm, Juli·Harper, Stacey·Gaheen, Sharon·Heiskanen, Mervi·Rocca-Serra, Philippe·Sansone, Susanna A

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

To enable the rational design of nanomaterials for improved efficacy and safety, it is critical to understand and exploit the physicochemical properties that drive biological behavior (Morris, 2010). Data mining and computer simulation are essential for deriving information about nanomaterial behavior; however, the datasets needed to support such studies are sparse and stored across a variety of repositories and resources. Schrurs and Lison (2012) have expressed the need for more coherence and structure in the conduct of nanotechnology research. Additionally, the lack of common reporting standards and non-uniformity of information reported have proven to be significant barriers to such data sharing and re-use. The Nanotechnology Working Group (Nano WG), of the US National Institutes of Health National Cancer Informatics Program, has been focused on addressing these barriers. The Nano WG - which includes representatives from over 20 organizations including government agencies, academia, industry, standards organizations, and alliances -has developed ISA-TAB-Nano (Thomas et al, 2013), a general framework for representing and integrating diverse types of data related to the description and characterization of nanomaterials. Recognizing that nanoparticle characterization studies have many of the same challenges as ‘omics-based assays, the Nano WG joined the ISA Commons (Sansone et al., 2012) to leverage lessons learned in ‘omics data sharing. The ISA Commons community brings together 50 collaborators at over 30 scientific organizations around the globe, including regulatory and industrial participants in an increasingly diverse set of life science domains. At the core of the ISA Commons is the ISA metadata tracking framework which forms the basis for the ISA-TAB-Nano extension. The extension of the ISA framework to nanotechnology domain illustrates the power of a synergistic approach that seeks the interoperability of data across multiple research disciplines. To increase adoption, especially in the commercial arena from vendors and manufactures, the ISA-Tab-Nano data-sharing specification has also been submitted for consideration as a standard to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Delivering a community-driven specification is only the first phase of the process. To be useful and used, ISA-TAB-Nano must be implemented by tools and databases to assist researchers in reporting their data accordingly, shielding them from unnecessary complexity. Our next step is to extend the open source ISA Software Suite to provide user-oriented tools for the collection, curation, and storage of data compliant with the ISA-TAB-Nano specification. Future work will also focus on the application of the ISA-TAB-Nano format to support emerging standards on minimal information about nanomaterials in biological research (Ostraat et al, 2012; MinChar). ISA-TAB-Nano development is a community-driven effort and we welcome new contributions, collaborations and domain expertise. We invite researchers, software developers, vendors, and other stakeholders to work with us to implement the ISA-Tab-Nano format in their existing systems and research. Likewise, we welcome engagement of regulators, funding agencies, editors, and other policy makers to discuss how this standard can be used to facilitate the sharing and reuse of nanotechnology data across a wide range of disciplines. More information about the ISA-TAB-Nano project can be found online at https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/ICR/ISA-TAB-Nano.

Explore related subjects

informatics nanotechnology

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Baker, Nathan A, Klemm, Juli, Harper, Stacey, Gaheen, Sharon, Heiskanen, Mervi, Rocca-Serra, Philippe, Sansone, Susanna A. 2013-02-05. Standardizng Data. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.12

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2014

Physicochemical signatures of nanoparticle-dependent complement activation

Nanoparticles are potentially powerful therapeutic tools that have the capacity to target drug payloads and imaging agents. However, some nanoparticles can activate complement, a branch of the innate immune system, and cause adverse side-effects. Recently, we developed an in vitro hemolytic assay protocol for measuring the nanoparticle-dependent complement activity of serum samples and applied this protocol to several nanoparticle formulations that differed in size, surface charge, and surface chemistry; quantifying the nanoparticle-dependent complement activity using a metric called Residual Hemolytic Activity (RHA). In the present work, we have used a decision tree learning algorithm to derive the rules for estimating nanoparticle-dependent complement response based on the data generated from the hemolytic assay studies. Our results indicate that physicochemical properties of nanoparticles, namely, size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, and mole percentage of the active surface ligand of a nanoparticle, can serve as good descriptors for prediction of nanoparticle-dependent complement activation in the decision tree modeling framework. The robustness and predictability of the model can be improved by training the model with additional data points that are uniformly distributed in the RHA/physicochemical descriptor space and by incorporating instability effects on nanoparticle physicochemical properties into the model.

informatics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

INCREASING THE TRANSPARENCY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF SPACE RADIATION SCIENCE: THE RADIATION BIOLOGY ONTOLOGY

Among the primary objectives of the Open/Open-Source Science paradigm are making scientific investigation data transparent and results reproducible [1], objectives shared by the FAIR principles [2]. To accomplish this, the conceptual framework that includes all the investigation objects needs to be accurately captured and communicated to all data consumers. A large part of this requires using metadata standards to annotate data collected. These standards should be readily accessible, informed by scientific community consensus and sufficiently specific to encompass all of the important aspects of the investigation. Starting in 2020 we have been co-leading an open consortium to develop a new metadata standard, the Radiation Biology Ontology (RBO), through the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) Foundry [3]. We began by transforming many of the terms from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement into concepts that can be formally related to existing OBO Foundry classes or attributes. We then identified and imported into the RBO existing OBO Foundry classes that have obvious relevance for radiation biomedicine (for example, concepts from the Environment Ontology that describe radiative processes, and concepts from the Gene Ontology dealing with molecular and cellular responses to radiation). Finally, we scrutinized datasets from investigations of radiation effects held in NASA GeneLab and LSDA repositories and added additional classes, instances, and attributes into the RBO that should be used to annotate these data. We developed the RBO using the open-source tools of GitHub and publish the RBO periodically through the NIH/NCBI BioPortal website, so systems worldwide can leverage the knowledge it contains [4]. This initial phase of concept modeling has yielded an RBO that at present has more than 300 declared concepts, with more than 3500 additional concepts imported from other OBO Foundry ontologies. While this first phase has focused on concepts for annotating samples, environments, exposures, and measurements, the next phase will center on supporting annotation of results and findings, such as concept models of molecular, cellular and tissue effects. The value of the RBO will be determined in part by our ability to engage the community in its development, and we have established a Radiobiology Informatics Consortium with unrestricted membership as the owner of the RBO in order to encourage investigators, system owners and other to join in this effort. Anyone can report issues or request new concept modeling or other features directly on GitHub. By using the BioPortal application programming interface, systems can pose dynamic queries to the latest version of the RBO for information on individual classes or entire hierarchies; this design eliminates the need for systems to be updated in order to use newer versions of the RBO. We hope to contribute to the advancement of open radiobiological science through the continued, open development of the RBO, that will provide more precise, machine-interpretable descriptions of investigations, as well as support data meta-analysis through machine learning or other artificial intelligence methods. REFERENCES [1] Open science in space. Nature Medicine, 2021. 27(9): p. 1485-1485. [2] Wilkinson, M.D., et al., The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data, 2016. 3: p. 160018. [3] Smith, B., et al., The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol, 2007. 25(11): p. 1251-5. [4] Whetzel, P.L., et al., BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications. Nucleic Acids Res, 2011. 39(Web Server issue): p. W541-5.

informatics↗