Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1197274

Materials Data on In3Cu7 by Materials Project

Abstract

Cu7In3 is Bergman Structure: Mg32(Al,Zn)49 Bergman-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are fifteen inequivalent Cu sites. In the first Cu site, Cu is bonded to eight Cu and four In atoms to form corner-sharing CuIn4Cu8 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.51–2.66 Å. There are two shorter (2.70 Å) and two longer (2.79 Å) Cu–In bond lengths. In the second Cu site, Cu is bonded to eight Cu and four In atoms to form CuIn4Cu8 cuboctahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuIn4Cu8 cuboctahedra and faces with two equivalent CuIn5Cu7 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.56–2.69 Å. There are two shorter (2.68 Å) and two longer (2.75 Å) Cu–In bond lengths. In the third Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to eight Cu and five In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.49–2.91 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.74–3.07 Å. In the fourth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Cu and six In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.62–2.82 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.73–3.03 Å. In the fifth Cu site, Cu is bonded to seven Cu and five In atoms to form distorted CuIn5Cu7 cuboctahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuIn4Cu8 cuboctahedra, an edgeedge with one CuIn5Cu7 cuboctahedra, and a faceface with one CuIn4Cu8 cuboctahedra. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.57–2.71 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.72–2.95 Å. In the sixth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to eight Cu and five In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.58–3.01 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.72–3.12 Å. In the seventh Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to seven Cu and five In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.55–3.11 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.67–2.90 Å. In the eighth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to nine Cu and four In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.60–3.12 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.65–2.93 Å. In the ninth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a distorted q6 geometry to eight Cu and four In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.55–2.70 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.77–2.97 Å. In the tenth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to six Cu and six In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–Cu bond distances ranging from 2.58–2.95 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.70–2.97 Å. In the eleventh Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to nine Cu and four In atoms. There are one shorter (2.62 Å) and one longer (2.63 Å) Cu–Cu bond lengths. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.66–2.90 Å. In the twelfth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight Cu and four In atoms. The Cu–Cu bond length is 2.57 Å. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.79–2.90 Å. In the thirteenth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to six Cu and five In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.61–2.83 Å. In the fourteenth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to six Cu and five In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.63–2.76 Å. In the fifteenth Cu site, Cu is bonded in a distorted q6 geometry to eight Cu and four In atoms. There are a spread of Cu–In bond distances ranging from 2.80–2.93 Å. There are six inequivalent In sites. In the first In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu and one In atom. The In–In bond length is 3.13 Å. In the second In site, In is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu atoms. In the third In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu atoms. In the fourth In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu atoms. In the fifth In site, In is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu atoms. In the sixth In site, In is bonded in a 11-coordinate geometry to eleven Cu atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-20. Materials Data on In3Cu7 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1197274

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗