Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1207466

Materials Data on Fe2CuO4 by Materials Project

Abstract

CuFe2O4 is Spinel-like structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are nine inequivalent Fe3+ sites. In the first Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CuO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–58°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–1.98 Å. In the second Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO4 tetrahedra, corners with four FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with three FeO6 octahedra, and edges with three CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.08 Å. In the third Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent FeO4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent CuO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CuO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.13 Å. In the fourth Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra and corners with six CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–60°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–1.94 Å. In the fifth Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, and edges with four CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.09 Å. In the sixth Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra and corners with six CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–59°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–1.93 Å. In the seventh Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra and corners with six CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–60°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–1.94 Å. In the eighth Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuO4 tetrahedra, corners with five FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with three FeO6 octahedra, and edges with three CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.08 Å. In the ninth Fe3+ site, Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra and corners with six CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–59°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–1.96 Å. There are six inequivalent Cu2+ sites. In the first Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form CuO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three CuO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–59°. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.03 Å. In the second Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO4 tetrahedra, corners with four FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one CuO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.21 Å. In the third Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CuO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.34 Å. In the fourth Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CuO6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.28 Å. In the fifth Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO4 tetrahedra, edges with two CuO6 octahedra, and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.34 Å. In the sixth Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuO4 tetrahedra, corners with five FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one CuO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.07–2.18 Å. There are eighteen inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe3Cu trigonal pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe2Cu2 trigonal pyramids. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe2Cu2 trigonal pyramids. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe2Cu2 trigonal pyramids. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the thirteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms. In the fourteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two equivalent Fe3+ and two Cu2+ atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OFe2Cu2 trigonal pyramids. In the fifteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the sixteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe3Cu trigonal pyramids. In the seventeenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Fe3+ and one Cu2+ atom. In the eighteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe3+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted corner and edge-sharing OFe4 trigonal pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-15. Materials Data on Fe2CuO4 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1207466

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗