Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1265619

AnalyzeThis: An Analysis Workflow-Aware Storage System

Abstract

The need for novel data analysis is urgent in the face of a data deluge from modern applications. Traditional approaches to data analysis incur significant data movement costs, moving data back and forth between the storage system and the processor. Emerging Active Flash devices enable processing on the flash, where the data already resides. An array of such Active Flash devices allows us to revisit how analysis workflows interact with storage systems. By seamlessly blending together the flash storage and data analysis, we create an analysis workflow-aware storage system, AnalyzeThis. Our guiding principle is that analysis-awareness be deeply ingrained in each and every layer of the storage, elevating data analyses as first-class citizens, and transforming AnalyzeThis into a potent analytics-aware appliance. We implement the AnalyzeThis storage system atop an emulation platform of the Active Flash array. Our results indicate that AnalyzeThis is viable, expediting workflow execution and minimizing data movement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sim, Hyogi, Kim, Youngjae, Vazhkudai, Sudharshan S, Tiwari, Devesh, Anwar, Ali, Butt, Ali R, Ramakrishnan, Lavanya. 2015-01-01. AnalyzeThis: An Analysis Workflow-Aware Storage System. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1265619

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Explaining Missing Data in Graphs: A Constraint-based Approach

Abstract: This paper introduces a constraint-based approach to clarify missing values in graphs. Our method capitalizes on a set S of graph data constraints. An explanation is a sequence of operational enforcement of S towards the recovery of interested yet missing data (e.g., attribute values, edges). We show that constraint-based approach helps us to understand not only why a value is missing, but also how to recover the missing value. We study S-explanation problem, which is to compute the optimal explanations with guarantees on the informativeness and conciseness. We show the problem is in ?P^2 for established graph data constraints such as graph keys and graph association rules. We develop an efficient bidirectional algorithm to compute optimal explanations, without enforcing S on the entire graph. We also show our algorithm can be easily extended to support graph refinement within limited time, and to explain missing answers. Using real-world graphs, we experimentally verify the effectiveness and efficiency of our algorithms.

Data Analytics↗

High-Performance Data Analytics Beyond the Relational and Graph Data Models with GEMS

Graphs represent an increasingly popular data model for data-analytics, since they can naturally represent relationships and interactions between entities. Relational databases and their pure table-based data model are not well suitable to store and process sparse data. Consequently, graph databases have gained interest in the last few years and the Resource Description Framework (RDF) became the standard data model for graph data. Nevertheless, while RDF is well suited to analyze the relationships between the entities, it is not efficient in representing their attributes and properties. In this work we propose the adoption of a new hybrid data model, based on attributed graphs, that aims at overcoming the limitations of the pure relational and graph data models. We present how we have re-designed the GEMS data-analytics framework to fully take advantage of the proposed hybrid data model. To improve analysts productivity, in addition to a C++ API for applications development, we adopt GraQL as input query language. We validate our approach implementing a set of queries on net-flow data and we compare our framework performance against Neo4j. Experimental results show significant performance improvement over Neo4j, up to several orders of magnitude when increasing the size of the input data.

Data Analytics↗

Considerations on the Use of Custom Accelerators for Big Data Analytics

Accelerators, including Graphic Processing Units (GPUs) for gen- eral purpose computation, many-core designs with wide vector units (e.g., Intel Phi), have become a common component of many high performance clusters. The appearance of more stable and reliable tools tools that can automatically convert code written in high-level specifications with annotations (such as C or C++) to hardware de- scription languages (High-Level Synthesis - HLS), is also setting the stage for a broader use of reconfigurable devices (e.g., Field Pro- grammable Gate Arrays - FPGAs) in high performance system for the implementation of custom accelerators, helped by the fact that new processors include advanced cache-coherent interconnects for these components. In this chapter, we briefly survey the status of the use of accelerators in high performance systems targeted at big data analytics applications. We argue that, although the progress in the use of accelerators for this class of applications has been sig- nificant, differently from scientific simulations there still are gaps to close. This is particularly true for the ”irregular” behaviors exhibited by no-SQL, graph databases. We focus our attention on the limits of HLS tools for data analytics and graph methods, and discuss a new architectural template that better fits the requirement of this class of applications. We validate the new architectural templates by mod- ifying the Graph Engine for Multithreaded System (GEMS) frame- work to support accelerators generated with such a methodology, and testing with queries coming from the Lehigh University Benchmark (LUBM). The architectural template enables better supporting the task and memory level parallelism present in graph methods by sup- porting a new control model and a enhanced memory interface. We show that out solution allows generating parallel accelerators, pro- viding speed ups with respect to conventional HLS flows. We finally draw conclusions and present a perspective on the use of reconfig- urable devices and Design Automation tools for data analytics.

Data Analytics↗