Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1272816

Materials Data on Li5(CuO2)3 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li5(CuO2)3 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are five inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.00 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.08 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.10 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.12 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing LiO4 trigonal pyramids. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.03 Å. There are three inequivalent Cu+2.33+ sites. In the first Cu+2.33+ site, Cu+2.33+ is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–1.97 Å. In the second Cu+2.33+ site, Cu+2.33+ is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.92 Å. In the third Cu+2.33+ site, Cu+2.33+ is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–1.98 Å. There are six inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids that share a cornercorner with one OLi4Cu2 octahedra, corners with four OLi3Cu2 square pyramids, corners with two equivalent OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with three OLi4Cu2 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one OLi3Cu2 square pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 44°. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form distorted OLi3Cu2 square pyramids that share a cornercorner with one OLi4Cu2 octahedra, corners with four OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with three OLi4Cu2 octahedra, an edgeedge with one OLi3Cu2 square pyramid, and an edgeedge with one OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 41°. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form distorted OLi3Cu2 square pyramids that share corners with two OLi4Cu2 octahedra, corners with three OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with two OLi4Cu2 octahedra, an edgeedge with one OLi3Cu2 square pyramid, and edges with two OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 5–42°. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form OLi4Cu2 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi4Cu2 octahedra, a cornercorner with one OLi3Cu2 square pyramid, corners with two OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent OLi4Cu2 octahedra, edges with three OLi3Cu2 square pyramids, and edges with two OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 2°. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids that share corners with two OLi4Cu2 octahedra, corners with three OLi3Cu2 square pyramids, corners with two equivalent OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with two OLi4Cu2 octahedra, and edges with two OLi3Cu2 square pyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 4–43°. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two Cu+2.33+ atoms to form distorted OLi4Cu2 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one OLi4Cu2 octahedra, corners with two OLi3Cu2 square pyramids, a cornercorner with one OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent OLi4Cu2 octahedra, edges with two OLi3Cu2 square pyramids, and edges with three OLi3Cu2 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 2°.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-05. Materials Data on Li5(CuO2)3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1272816

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗