Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1276634

Materials Data on Sr11InSb9 by Materials Project

Abstract

Sr11InSb9 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Iba2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are six inequivalent Sr2+ sites. In the first Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to six Sb+2.78- atoms to form SrSb6 octahedra that share corners with six SrSb6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent SrSb6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent InSb4 tetrahedra, faces with two equivalent SrSb6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 34–40°. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.24–3.83 Å. In the second Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to seven Sb+2.78- atoms to form distorted SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids that share corners with six SrSb6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, a cornercorner with one InSb4 tetrahedra, edges with three equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, faces with five SrSb6 octahedra, and a faceface with one InSb4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 33–55°. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.25–3.96 Å. In the third Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to six Sb+2.78- atoms to form distorted SrSb6 octahedra that share corners with six SrSb6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, a cornercorner with one InSb4 tetrahedra, edges with three SrSb6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one InSb4 tetrahedra, a faceface with one SrSb6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 33–53°. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.27–3.59 Å. In the fourth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five Sb+2.78- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.23–3.66 Å. In the fifth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Sb+2.78- atoms. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.25–4.03 Å. In the sixth Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to six Sb+2.78- atoms to form distorted SrSb6 octahedra that share corners with five SrSb6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, corners with two equivalent InSb4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SrSb6 octahedra, faces with two SrSb6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 33–56°. There are a spread of Sr–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.22–3.54 Å. In3+ is bonded to four Sb+2.78- atoms to form InSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with six SrSb6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids, edges with four SrSb6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent SrSb7 pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 44–56°. There are two shorter (2.98 Å) and two longer (2.99 Å) In–Sb bond lengths. There are five inequivalent Sb+2.78- sites. In the first Sb+2.78- site, Sb+2.78- is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Sr2+ atoms. In the second Sb+2.78- site, Sb+2.78- is bonded in a 2-coordinate geometry to eight Sr2+ and one Sb+2.78- atom. The Sb–Sb bond length is 2.90 Å. In the third Sb+2.78- site, Sb+2.78- is bonded in a 9-coordinate geometry to eight Sr2+ and one In3+ atom. In the fourth Sb+2.78- site, Sb+2.78- is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to seven Sr2+ and one In3+ atom. In the fifth Sb+2.78- site, Sb+2.78- is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to eight Sr2+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-30. Materials Data on Sr11InSb9 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1276634

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗