Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1277828

Materials Data on Sr3InP3 by Materials Project

Abstract

Sr3InP3 crystallizes in the orthorhombic Pnma space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Sr2+ sites. In the first Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to five P3- atoms to form distorted SrP5 square pyramids that share corners with five equivalent SrP6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, corners with five equivalent SrP5 trigonal bipyramids, an edgeedge with one SrP6 octahedra, edges with four equivalent SrP5 square pyramids, edges with three equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one SrP5 trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 44–53°. There are a spread of Sr–P bond distances ranging from 3.06–3.26 Å. In the second Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to five P3- atoms to form distorted SrP5 trigonal bipyramids that share corners with six equivalent SrP6 octahedra, corners with five equivalent SrP5 square pyramids, corners with two equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one SrP6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one SrP5 square pyramid, edges with two equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent SrP5 trigonal bipyramids, and a faceface with one SrP6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–62°. There are a spread of Sr–P bond distances ranging from 3.04–3.18 Å. In the third Sr2+ site, Sr2+ is bonded to six P3- atoms to form distorted SrP6 octahedra that share corners with five equivalent SrP5 square pyramids, corners with three equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, corners with six equivalent SrP5 trigonal bipyramids, edges with four equivalent SrP6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one SrP5 square pyramid, edges with two equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one SrP5 trigonal bipyramid, and a faceface with one SrP5 trigonal bipyramid. There are a spread of Sr–P bond distances ranging from 3.08–3.52 Å. In3+ is bonded to four P3- atoms to form InP4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent SrP6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent SrP5 square pyramids, corners with two equivalent InP4 tetrahedra, corners with two equivalent SrP5 trigonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent SrP6 octahedra, edges with three equivalent SrP5 square pyramids, and edges with two equivalent SrP5 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 18–44°. There are one shorter (2.62 Å) and three longer (2.66 Å) In–P bond lengths. There are three inequivalent P3- sites. In the first P3- site, P3- is bonded to six Sr2+ and one In3+ atom to form distorted PSr6In pentagonal bipyramids that share corners with six equivalent PSr5In octahedra, an edgeedge with one PSr5In octahedra, a faceface with one PSr5In octahedra, and faces with two equivalent PSr6In pentagonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 9–89°. In the second P3- site, P3- is bonded to five Sr2+ and one In3+ atom to form distorted PSr5In octahedra that share corners with six equivalent PSr6In pentagonal bipyramids, edges with four equivalent PSr5In octahedra, an edgeedge with one PSr6In pentagonal bipyramid, and a faceface with one PSr6In pentagonal bipyramid. In the third P3- site, P3- is bonded in a 7-coordinate geometry to five Sr2+ and two equivalent In3+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-22. Materials Data on Sr3InP3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1277828

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗