Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1282916

Materials Data on Li27Sb10 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li27Sb10 crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are ten inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with seven LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with three LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–57°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.78–2.86 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Sb+2.70- atoms to form distorted LiSb6 octahedra that share corners with four LiSb6 octahedra, corners with twenty-four LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with seven LiSb6 octahedra, and faces with eight LiSb4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 1–6°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.10–3.31 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with eight LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with three LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–59°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.77–2.85 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with ten LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with two LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–62°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.90 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiSb6 octahedra, corners with twenty-four LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with eight LiSb6 octahedra, and faces with eight LiSb4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–5°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.16–3.31 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with nine LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with three LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–59°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.81–2.90 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with eight LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with three LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–58°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.77–2.90 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb6 octahedra that share corners with six LiSb6 octahedra, corners with twenty-four LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with seven LiSb6 octahedra, and faces with eight LiSb4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–6°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 3.21–3.29 Å. In the ninth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four Sb+2.70- atoms to form LiSb4 tetrahedra that share corners with nine LiSb6 octahedra, corners with sixteen LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with six LiSb4 tetrahedra, and faces with three LiSb6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–59°. There are a spread of Li–Sb bond distances ranging from 2.78–2.90 Å. In the tenth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Sb+2.70- atoms to form distorted LiSb6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiSb6 octahedra, corners with twenty-four LiSb4 tetrahedra, edges with eight LiSb6 octahedra, and faces with eight LiSb4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 1°. There are two shorter (3.09 Å) and four longer (3.29 Å) Li–Sb bond lengths. There are three inequivalent Sb+2.70- sites. In the first Sb+2.70- site, Sb+2.70- is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to twelve Li1+ atoms. In the second Sb+2.70- site, Sb+2.70- is bonded in a distorted body-centered cubic geometry to twelve Li1+ atoms. In the third Sb+2.70- site, Sb+2.70- is bonded in a 8-coordinate geometry to thirteen Li1+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-15. Materials Data on Li27Sb10 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1282916

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗