Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1284263

Materials Data on Li3ScCl6 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li3ScCl6 crystallizes in the monoclinic C2 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are seven inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra, edges with three equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with five LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 6°. There are four shorter (2.54 Å) and two longer (2.66 Å) Li–Cl bond lengths. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra, edges with three equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with five LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 6°. There are a spread of Li–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.52–2.65 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra, edges with three equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with five LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 7°. There are four shorter (2.56 Å) and two longer (2.61 Å) Li–Cl bond lengths. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two ScCl6 octahedra, corners with four LiCl6 octahedra, edges with two ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with four LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 3–7°. There are a spread of Li–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.58–2.68 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, corners with four LiCl6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with four LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 4–6°. There are a spread of Li–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.57–2.72 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, corners with four LiCl6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with four LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 4–7°. There are a spread of Li–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.58–2.67 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form LiCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra, edges with three equivalent ScCl6 octahedra, and edges with five LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 6–7°. There are a spread of Li–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.52–2.64 Å. There are two inequivalent Sc3+ sites. In the first Sc3+ site, Sc3+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form ScCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra and edges with eight LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 3–4°. There are a spread of Sc–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.48–2.50 Å. In the second Sc3+ site, Sc3+ is bonded to six Cl1- atoms to form ScCl6 octahedra that share corners with two LiCl6 octahedra and edges with eight LiCl6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 4°. There are a spread of Sc–Cl bond distances ranging from 2.48–2.50 Å. There are twelve inequivalent Cl1- sites. In the first Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the second Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the third Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the fourth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the fifth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the sixth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the seventh Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the eighth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the ninth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the tenth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the eleventh Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom. In the twelfth Cl1- site, Cl1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to three Li1+ and one Sc3+ atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-15. Materials Data on Li3ScCl6 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1284263

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗