Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1291033

Materials Data on Li4Ti3Cu3(TeO8)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Ti3Cu3(TeO8)2 is Hausmannite-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent TeO6 octahedra, corners with four TiO6 octahedra, and corners with five CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–65°. There is two shorter (1.99 Å) and two longer (2.00 Å) Li–O bond length. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.87–2.13 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.12 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with four CuO6 octahedra and corners with five TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.14 Å. There are two inequivalent Ti4+ sites. In the first Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–51°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.81–2.26 Å. In the second Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TeO6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.03 Å. There are two inequivalent Cu2+ sites. In the first Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CuO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 51°. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.27 Å. In the second Cu2+ site, Cu2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted CuO6 octahedra that share corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TeO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.38 Å. There are two inequivalent Te5+ sites. In the first Te5+ site, Te5+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Te–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.53 Å. In the second Te5+ site, Te5+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–51°. There are a spread of Te–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.06 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Te5+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Cu2+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a tetrahedral geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Cu2+ atom. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two equivalent Cu2+ atoms to form corner-sharing OLiTiCu2 tetrahedra. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Te5+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two equivalent Cu2+ atoms. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, two equivalent Cu2+, and one Te5+ atom to form distorted corner-sharing OLiCu2Te tetrahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on Li4Ti3Cu3(TeO8)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1291033

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗