Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1291705

Materials Data on Li4Cu5F17 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Cu5F17 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form distorted LiF4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with six CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–56°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.02 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with five CuF6 octahedra and a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–60°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.86–1.99 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with six CuF6 octahedra and a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 41–59°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.92–1.99 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four F1- atoms to form LiF4 tetrahedra that share corners with six CuF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, and a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–63°. There are a spread of Li–F bond distances ranging from 1.87–1.97 Å. There are five inequivalent Cu+2.60+ sites. In the first Cu+2.60+ site, Cu+2.60+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form CuF6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuF6 octahedra, corners with five LiF4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 trigonal pyramid, and edges with two CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 19°. There are a spread of Cu–F bond distances ranging from 1.86–2.01 Å. In the second Cu+2.60+ site, Cu+2.60+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form CuF6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuF6 octahedra, corners with three LiF4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent LiF4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with two CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 15°. There are a spread of Cu–F bond distances ranging from 1.88–2.04 Å. In the third Cu+2.60+ site, Cu+2.60+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form CuF6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuF6 octahedra, a cornercorner with one LiF4 tetrahedra, corners with three LiF4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 18°. There are a spread of Cu–F bond distances ranging from 1.85–2.06 Å. In the fourth Cu+2.60+ site, Cu+2.60+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form CuF6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one CuF6 octahedra, corners with two LiF4 tetrahedra, corners with two LiF4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 18°. There are a spread of Cu–F bond distances ranging from 1.84–2.14 Å. In the fifth Cu+2.60+ site, Cu+2.60+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form CuF6 octahedra that share corners with two CuF6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiF4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three CuF6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 15–19°. There are a spread of Cu–F bond distances ranging from 1.83–2.21 Å. There are seventeen inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two equivalent Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 150 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the eighth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the ninth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a bent 120 degrees geometry to one Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the tenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the eleventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a T-shaped geometry to three Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the twelfth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the thirteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a T-shaped geometry to three Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the fourteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the fifteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Cu+2.60+ atoms. In the sixteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to two Li1+ and one Cu+2.60+ atom. In the seventeenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+ and two Cu+2.60+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-30. Materials Data on Li4Cu5F17 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1291705

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗