Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1295305

Materials Data on Li4Ni8O9F7 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Ni8O9F7 is Hausmannite-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to three O2- and one F1- atom to form LiO3F tetrahedra that share corners with twelve NiO5F octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–66°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.07 Å. The Li–F bond length is 1.89 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to two O2- and two F1- atoms to form LiO2F2 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve NiO5F octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–69°. There are one shorter (2.01 Å) and one longer (2.02 Å) Li–O bond lengths. There is one shorter (1.89 Å) and one longer (1.91 Å) Li–F bond length. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to two O2- and two F1- atoms to form LiO2F2 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve NiO5F octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–68°. There are one shorter (1.97 Å) and one longer (2.05 Å) Li–O bond lengths. Both Li–F bond lengths are 1.89 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to two O2- and two F1- atoms to form LiO2F2 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve NiO5F octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–69°. There are one shorter (1.97 Å) and one longer (2.03 Å) Li–O bond lengths. There is one shorter (1.89 Å) and one longer (1.91 Å) Li–F bond length. There are eight inequivalent Ni+2.62+ sites. In the first Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to five O2- and one F1- atom to form NiO5F octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO4F2 octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–2.05 Å. The Ni–F bond length is 2.30 Å. In the second Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form NiO3F3 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO4F2 octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 1.85–1.93 Å. There are a spread of Ni–F bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.09 Å. In the third Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form NiO2F4 octahedra that share corners with six LiO2F2 tetrahedra and edges with six NiO5F octahedra. There is one shorter (1.98 Å) and one longer (1.99 Å) Ni–O bond length. There are a spread of Ni–F bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.06 Å. In the fourth Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form NiO3F3 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO5F octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.01 Å. There are a spread of Ni–F bond distances ranging from 2.06–2.08 Å. In the fifth Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form NiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO2F4 octahedra. All Ni–O bond lengths are 1.89 Å. There are one shorter (2.22 Å) and one longer (2.24 Å) Ni–F bond lengths. In the sixth Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form NiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO5F octahedra. There are a spread of Ni–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.90 Å. There are one shorter (2.16 Å) and one longer (2.21 Å) Ni–F bond lengths. In the seventh Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form NiO2F4 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO4F2 octahedra. Both Ni–O bond lengths are 1.99 Å. There are a spread of Ni–F bond distances ranging from 2.04–2.06 Å. In the eighth Ni+2.62+ site, Ni+2.62+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form NiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with six LiO3F tetrahedra and edges with six NiO4F2 octahedra. There is two shorter (1.89 Å) and two longer (1.90 Å) Ni–O bond length. There are one shorter (2.20 Å) and one longer (2.23 Å) Ni–F bond lengths. There are nine inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 trigonal pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiNi3 tetrahedra. There are seven inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Ni+2.62+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-04. Materials Data on Li4Ni8O9F7 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1295305

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗