Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1296228

Materials Data on LiCo2OF3 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiCo2OF3 is Spinel-derived structured and crystallizes in the trigonal R3m space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six F1- atoms to form LiF6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiOF3 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent CoOF3 tetrahedra, and edges with six equivalent CoO2F4 octahedra. There are three shorter (2.02 Å) and three longer (2.08 Å) Li–F bond lengths. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to one O2- and three equivalent F1- atoms to form LiOF3 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiF6 octahedra and corners with nine equivalent CoO2F4 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 54–59°. The Li–O bond length is 1.96 Å. All Li–F bond lengths are 1.97 Å. There are two inequivalent Co2+ sites. In the first Co2+ site, Co2+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form CoO2F4 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiOF3 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent CoOF3 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent LiF6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent CoO2F4 octahedra. There is one shorter (1.96 Å) and one longer (2.01 Å) Co–O bond length. There are two shorter (2.15 Å) and two longer (2.19 Å) Co–F bond lengths. In the second Co2+ site, Co2+ is bonded to one O2- and three equivalent F1- atoms to form CoOF3 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiF6 octahedra and corners with nine equivalent CoO2F4 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 53–63°. The Co–O bond length is 1.90 Å. All Co–F bond lengths are 2.01 Å. There are two inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Co2+ atoms to form corner-sharing OCo4 tetrahedra. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three equivalent Co2+ atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiCo3 trigonal pyramids. There are two inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Co2+ atoms. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to two Li1+ and two equivalent Co2+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-08-03. Materials Data on LiCo2OF3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1296228

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗