Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1297791

Materials Data on Li8TiMn3O12 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li8TiMn3O12 is Caswellsilverite-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are eight inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with eight LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MnO6 octahedra, edges with five LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 38–52°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.05–2.16 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with six LiO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, edges with three MnO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 46–52°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.08–2.16 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with eight LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, edges with five LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 38–52°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.07–2.15 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO6 octahedra, corners with six MnO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–52°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.07–2.17 Å. In the fifth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with six LiO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, edges with three MnO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–53°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.11–2.17 Å. In the sixth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO6 octahedra, corners with six MnO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MnO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 48–53°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.13–2.20 Å. In the seventh Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with eight LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MnO6 octahedra, edges with five LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–51°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.15 Å. In the eighth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with eight LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MnO6 octahedra, edges with five LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 40–50°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.06–2.13 Å. Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with ten LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 40–53°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–1.99 Å. There are three inequivalent Mn4+ sites. In the first Mn4+ site, Mn4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with ten LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 41–53°. There is four shorter (1.94 Å) and two longer (1.96 Å) Mn–O bond length. In the second Mn4+ site, Mn4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with ten LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 40–51°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–1.98 Å. In the third Mn4+ site, Mn4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with ten LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and faces with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 40–51°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–1.98 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi4TiMn pentagonal pyramids. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi4Mn2 pentagonal pyramids. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi4Mn2 pentagonal pyramids. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to four Li1+ and two Mn4+ atoms. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+, one Ti4+, and one Mn4+ atom to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLi4TiMn pentagonal pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on Li8TiMn3O12 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1297791

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗