Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1298455

Materials Data on Li3Cu2(SO4)3 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li3Cu2(SO4)3 crystallizes in the monoclinic P2_1/c space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to five O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.57 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a 5-coordinate geometry to five O2- atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.44 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form distorted LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with four SO4 tetrahedra and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–1.99 Å. There are two inequivalent Cu+1.50+ sites. In the first Cu+1.50+ site, Cu+1.50+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to six O2- atoms. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.53 Å. In the second Cu+1.50+ site, Cu+1.50+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted CuO6 octahedra that share corners with six SO4 tetrahedra and edges with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra. There are a spread of Cu–O bond distances ranging from 2.05–2.39 Å. There are three inequivalent S6+ sites. In the first S6+ site, S6+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra and a cornercorner with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 38–43°. There are a spread of S–O bond distances ranging from 1.47–1.50 Å. In the second S6+ site, S6+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra and a cornercorner with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 23–48°. There are a spread of S–O bond distances ranging from 1.46–1.51 Å. In the third S6+ site, S6+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form SO4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra and corners with two equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 44–52°. There are a spread of S–O bond distances ranging from 1.45–1.51 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to one Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a bent 150 degrees geometry to one Cu+1.50+ and one S6+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a bent 150 degrees geometry to one Cu+1.50+ and one S6+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to one Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a linear geometry to one Cu+1.50+ and one S6+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to two Li1+, one Cu+1.50+, and one S6+ atom.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-29. Materials Data on Li3Cu2(SO4)3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1298455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗