Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1298849

Materials Data on Li2MgCo13O28 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2MgCo13O28 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six CoO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MgO6 octahedra, and edges with five CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 11–16°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.09–2.26 Å. Mg2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MgO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra and edges with six CoO6 octahedra. There are four shorter (2.02 Å) and two longer (2.07 Å) Mg–O bond lengths. There are seven inequivalent Co4+ sites. In the first Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form edge-sharing CoO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.87–1.91 Å. In the second Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra and edges with six CoO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.87–1.90 Å. In the third Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MgO6 octahedra, and edges with five CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 15°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.84–1.91 Å. In the fourth Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MgO6 octahedra, and edges with five CoO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.84–1.91 Å. In the fifth Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one MgO6 octahedra, and edges with five CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 11–16°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.92 Å. In the sixth Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, and edges with six CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 14°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.86–1.93 Å. In the seventh Co4+ site, Co4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra and edges with six CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 13°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.88–1.92 Å. There are fourteen inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal non-coplanar geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Co4+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Co4+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to one Mg2+ and two Co4+ atoms. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Co4+ atoms. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Co4+ atoms. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Mg2+, and two Co4+ atoms. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Co4+ atoms. In the thirteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Mg2+, and two Co4+ atoms. In the fourteenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted T-shaped geometry to three Co4+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-01. Materials Data on Li2MgCo13O28 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1298849

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗