Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1300595

Materials Data on Li4Ti3Fe5O16 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Ti3Fe5O16 is Spinel-derived structured and crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with four TiO6 octahedra and corners with eight FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.03 Å. In the second Li site, Li is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.79–2.01 Å. In the third Li site, Li is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O atoms. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.80–1.97 Å. In the fourth Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with five TiO6 octahedra and corners with seven FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 54–63°. There are two shorter (1.99 Å) and two longer (2.01 Å) Li–O bond lengths. There are three inequivalent Ti sites. In the first Ti site, Ti is bonded to six O atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–52°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.02 Å. In the second Ti site, Ti is bonded to six O atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–52°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.03 Å. In the third Ti site, Ti is bonded to six O atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 51°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.05 Å. There are five inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four FeO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one FeO6 octahedra, and edges with two TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–53°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.14 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one FeO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–53°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.06 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with four TiO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–53°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.11 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 51–52°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.05 Å. In the fifth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 53°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.07 Å. There are sixteen inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms. In the second O site, O is bonded to one Li, two Ti, and one Fe atom to form distorted OLiTi2Fe tetrahedra that share corners with four OLiTi2Fe tetrahedra and edges with two OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra. In the third O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Ti, and one Fe atom. In the fourth O site, O is bonded to one Li, two Ti, and one Fe atom to form distorted corner-sharing OLiTi2Fe tetrahedra. In the fifth O site, O is bonded to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra. In the sixth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms. In the seventh O site, O is bonded to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms to form distorted OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra that share corners with four OLiTi2Fe tetrahedra and edges with two OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra. In the eighth O site, O is bonded to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms to form distorted OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra that share corners with four OLiTi2Fe tetrahedra and edges with two OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra. In the ninth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, two Ti, and one Fe atom. In the tenth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Fe atoms. In the eleventh O site, O is bonded to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms to form distorted OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra that share corners with four OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra and edges with two OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the twelfth O site, O is bonded to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms to form distorted OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra that share corners with four OLiTiFe2 tetrahedra and edges with two OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the thirteenth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms. In the fourteenth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms. In the fifteenth O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the sixteenth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Ti, and two Fe atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-08-03. Materials Data on Li4Ti3Fe5O16 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1300595

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗