Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1300662

Materials Data on Li(FeO2)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li(FeO2)2 is Spinel-like structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 57–64°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.03 Å. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to four O atoms to form distorted LiO4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 60–65°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.78–1.95 Å. There are four inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid, edges with five FeO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 50–52°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–1.99 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–55°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.11 Å. In the third Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid, edges with five FeO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–52°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.92–1.98 Å. In the fourth Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, a cornercorner with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid, edges with five FeO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 trigonal pyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 55°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.06 Å. There are eight inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Fe atoms. In the second O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Fe atoms. In the third O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Fe atoms. In the fifth O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the sixth O site, O is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li and three Fe atoms. In the seventh O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiFe3 tetrahedra. In the eighth O site, O is bonded to one Li and three Fe atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiFe3 tetrahedra.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-08-03. Materials Data on Li(FeO2)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1300662

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗