Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1300665

Materials Data on Li2TiMn3O8 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2TiMn3O8 is Hausmannite-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are two inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent TiO6 octahedra and corners with nine MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 57–63°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.06 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with three MnO6 octahedra, and edges with three MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–68°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.82–1.98 Å. Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with six MnO6 octahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, and edges with three MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–54°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.16 Å. There are three inequivalent Mn+3.33+ sites. In the first Mn+3.33+ site, Mn+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, edges with four MnO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–54°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.32 Å. In the second Mn+3.33+ site, Mn+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, edges with four MnO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 53°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–2.34 Å. In the third Mn+3.33+ site, Mn+3.33+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, edges with four MnO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 47–48°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.01 Å. There are eight inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms to form distorted OLiTiMn2 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLiMn3 tetrahedra, corners with two OLiTiMn2 trigonal pyramids, and edges with two OLiTiMn2 trigonal pyramids. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Mn+3.33+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+ and three Mn+3.33+ atoms to form corner-sharing OLiMn3 tetrahedra. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiTiMn2 trigonal pyramids. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Mn+3.33+ atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing OLiTiMn2 trigonal pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-04-30. Materials Data on Li2TiMn3O8 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1300665

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗