Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1302113

Materials Data on LiMg(Fe5O8)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

LiMg(Fe5O8)2 is Spinel-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six FeO4 tetrahedra and edges with six FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.11–2.15 Å. Mg2+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form MgO4 tetrahedra that share corners with twelve FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–60°. There is two shorter (1.99 Å) and two longer (2.00 Å) Mg–O bond length. There are eight inequivalent Fe+2.90+ sites. In the first Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with three equivalent MgO4 tetrahedra, corners with three equivalent FeO4 tetrahedra, and edges with six FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–1.98 Å. In the second Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MgO4 tetrahedra, corners with four FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.08 Å. In the third Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MgO4 tetrahedra, corners with four FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.07 Å. In the fourth Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–59°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–1.97 Å. In the fifth Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form FeO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent LiO6 octahedra and corners with nine FeO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 55–59°. There is three shorter (1.89 Å) and one longer (1.96 Å) Fe–O bond length. In the sixth Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one MgO4 tetrahedra, corners with five FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.97–2.02 Å. In the seventh Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one MgO4 tetrahedra, corners with five FeO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one LiO6 octahedra, and edges with five FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.02 Å. In the eighth Fe+2.90+ site, Fe+2.90+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form corner-sharing FeO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 56–62°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.06 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Mg2+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Mg2+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe+2.90+ atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OFe4 trigonal pyramids. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Mg2+ and three Fe+2.90+ atoms to form distorted corner-sharing OMgFe3 tetrahedra. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe+2.90+ atoms to form distorted OFe4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with three equivalent OMgFe3 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one OFe4 tetrahedra, and edges with two equivalent OFe4 trigonal pyramids. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe+2.90+ atoms to form distorted OFe4 trigonal pyramids that share corners with three OMgFe3 tetrahedra, corners with two OFe4 trigonal pyramids, an edgeedge with one OFe4 tetrahedra, and edges with two OFe4 trigonal pyramids. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Fe+2.90+ atoms to form distorted OFe4 tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent OMgFe3 tetrahedra, corners with three OFe4 trigonal pyramids, and edges with three OFe4 trigonal pyramids.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on LiMg(Fe5O8)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1302113

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗