Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1304111

Materials Data on Li4Ti3Mn3Nb2O16 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Ti3Nb2Mn3O16 is Hausmannite-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic Cm space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with four TiO6 octahedra, and corners with five MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 54–67°. There are two shorter (2.02 Å) and two longer (2.03 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four O2- atoms. There is one shorter (1.86 Å) and three longer (2.07 Å) Li–O bond length. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share a cornercorner with one MnO6 octahedra, corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent NbO6 octahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 45–65°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.86–2.05 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- atoms to form LiO4 tetrahedra that share corners with three equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with four MnO6 octahedra, and corners with five TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 44–66°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.20 Å. There are two inequivalent Ti4+ sites. In the first Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one NbO6 octahedra, edges with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 49°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.31 Å. In the second Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one NbO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–53°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.85–2.22 Å. There are two inequivalent Nb5+ sites. In the first Nb5+ site, Nb5+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted NbO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with six LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one MnO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–53°. There are a spread of Nb–O bond distances ranging from 1.91–2.23 Å. In the second Nb5+ site, Nb5+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted NbO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, corners with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra, corners with three equivalent LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one TiO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 49–53°. There are a spread of Nb–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.33 Å. There are two inequivalent Mn2+ sites. In the first Mn2+ site, Mn2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with four LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one NbO6 octahedra, and edges with four equivalent TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 49°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 2.10–2.20 Å. In the second Mn2+ site, Mn2+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form MnO6 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent NbO6 octahedra, corners with three LiO4 tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one NbO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent MnO6 octahedra, and an edgeedge with one LiO4 tetrahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 52–53°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 2.06–2.33 Å. There are twelve inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Nb5+, and one Mn2+ atom. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Nb5+ atom. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Mn2+ atom to form distorted OLiTi2Mn trigonal pyramids that share corners with four OLiMn2Nb tetrahedra and edges with two equivalent OLiTiMnNb tetrahedra. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Mn2+ atom to form OLiTi2Mn tetrahedra that share corners with four equivalent OLiTiMnNb tetrahedra and corners with three equivalent OLiTi2Mn trigonal pyramids. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two equivalent Mn2+ atoms to form corner-sharing OLiTiMn2 tetrahedra. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Nb5+, and one Mn2+ atom to form distorted OLiTiMnNb tetrahedra that share corners with three OLiTi2Mn tetrahedra, an edgeedge with one OLiTiMnNb tetrahedra, and an edgeedge with one OLiTi2Mn trigonal pyramid. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Nb5+ atom. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Nb5+, and two equivalent Mn2+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Nb5+, and one Mn2+ atom. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, and two equivalent Mn2+ atoms. In the eleventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, one Ti4+, one Nb5+, and one Mn2+ atom. In the twelfth O2- site, O2- is bonded to one Li1+, one Nb5+, and two equivalent Mn2+ atoms to form distorted OLiMn2Nb tetrahedra that share corners with two equivalent OLiTiMn2 tetrahedra and a cornercorner with one OLiTi2Mn trigonal pyramid.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-02. Materials Data on Li4Ti3Mn3Nb2O16 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1304111

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗