Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1306581

Materials Data on Mn6O5F7 by Materials Project

Abstract

Mn6O5F7 crystallizes in the triclinic P1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are twelve inequivalent Mn+2.83+ sites. In the first Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form MnO3F3 octahedra that share corners with five MnO2F4 octahedra and edges with four MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 29–56°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.12 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.13 Å. In the second Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form MnO2F4 octahedra that share corners with eight MnO3F3 octahedra and edges with two equivalent MnO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–59°. Both Mn–O bond lengths are 1.93 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 1.99–2.17 Å. In the third Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form MnO2F4 octahedra that share corners with five MnO2F4 octahedra and edges with three MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 18–56°. There is one shorter (1.97 Å) and one longer (1.98 Å) Mn–O bond length. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.13 Å. In the fourth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to two O2- and four F1- atoms to form MnO2F4 octahedra that share corners with five MnO3F3 octahedra and edges with two MnO2F4 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 18–57°. There are one shorter (1.95 Å) and one longer (2.21 Å) Mn–O bond lengths. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.03–2.10 Å. In the fifth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to one O2- and five F1- atoms to form MnOF5 octahedra that share corners with six MnO2F4 octahedra and edges with two equivalent MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–61°. The Mn–O bond length is 2.03 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.07–2.31 Å. In the sixth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 29–61°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.29 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.01–2.13 Å. In the seventh Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form distorted MnO4F2 octahedra that share corners with eight MnO3F3 octahedra and edges with two equivalent MnO2F4 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 44–56°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.94–1.98 Å. There are one shorter (2.27 Å) and one longer (2.28 Å) Mn–F bond lengths. In the eighth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to four O2- and two F1- atoms to form MnO4F2 octahedra that share corners with five MnO2F4 octahedra and edges with four MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–58°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.07 Å. There are one shorter (2.08 Å) and one longer (2.32 Å) Mn–F bond lengths. In the ninth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form distorted MnO3F3 octahedra that share corners with six MnO3F3 octahedra and edges with two equivalent MnOF5 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 38–56°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.08 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.09–2.38 Å. In the tenth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded in a 6-coordinate geometry to three O2- and three F1- atoms. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.95–2.27 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.39 Å. In the eleventh Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form a mixture of edge and corner-sharing MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 42–59°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.03 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.00–2.24 Å. In the twelfth Mn+2.83+ site, Mn+2.83+ is bonded to three O2- and three F1- atoms to form a mixture of distorted edge and corner-sharing MnO3F3 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 24–59°. There are a spread of Mn–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.07 Å. There are a spread of Mn–F bond distances ranging from 2.02–2.33 Å. There are ten inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry to four Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to four Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the seventh O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal pyramidal geometry to four Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the eighth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the ninth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the tenth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. There are fourteen inequivalent F1- sites. In the first F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the second F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the third F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the fourth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to four Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the fifth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the sixth F1- site, F1- is bonded in an L-shaped geometry to two Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the seventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a water-like geometry to two Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the eighth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the ninth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a water-like geometry to two Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the tenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the eleventh F1- site, F1- is bonded in a distorted trigonal planar geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the twelfth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the thirteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a water-like geometry to two Mn+2.83+ atoms. In the fourteenth F1- site, F1- is bonded in a 3-coordinate geometry to three Mn+2.83+ atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-04. Materials Data on Mn6O5F7 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1306581

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗