Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1306874

Materials Data on Li4Ti3(CoO4)3 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li4Ti3(CoO4)3 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six CoO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent CoO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 10–11°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.09–2.23 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form distorted LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six CoO6 octahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–18°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 1.98–2.58 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share corners with six TiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 5–17°. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.14–2.28 Å. There are two inequivalent Ti4+ sites. In the first Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share a cornercorner with one LiO6 octahedra, edges with two TiO6 octahedra, edges with four CoO6 octahedra, and edges with five LiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 17°. There are a spread of Ti–O bond distances ranging from 1.90–2.06 Å. In the second Ti4+ site, Ti4+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form TiO6 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent TiO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four CoO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 5–11°. There is four shorter (1.98 Å) and two longer (1.99 Å) Ti–O bond length. There are two inequivalent Co+2.67+ sites. In the first Co+2.67+ site, Co+2.67+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO6 octahedra, edges with two CoO6 octahedra, edges with three LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–17°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 1.93–2.01 Å. In the second Co+2.67+ site, Co+2.67+ is bonded to six O2- atoms to form CoO6 octahedra that share corners with six LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent CoO6 octahedra, edges with four LiO6 octahedra, and edges with four TiO6 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 10–18°. There are a spread of Co–O bond distances ranging from 2.08–2.13 Å. There are six inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, one Ti4+, and two equivalent Co+2.67+ atoms to form OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids that share a cornercorner with one OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, corners with three OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, corners with three equivalent OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramids, edges with two equivalent OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, edges with four OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 2°. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, two equivalent Ti4+, and one Co+2.67+ atom to form distorted OLi2Ti2Co square pyramids that share corners with four OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, a cornercorner with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, edges with four OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, and edges with two equivalent OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramids. In the third O2- site, O2- is bonded to three Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Co+2.67+ atoms to form OLi3TiCo2 octahedra that share corners with four equivalent OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, a cornercorner with one OLi2TiCo2 square pyramid, a cornercorner with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid, edges with eight OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, and edges with two equivalent OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramids. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 0°. In the fourth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two Li1+, two Ti4+, and one Co+2.67+ atom to form OLi2Ti2Co square pyramids that share corners with seven OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, a cornercorner with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid, edges with four equivalent OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, edges with two OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid. In the fifth O2- site, O2- is bonded in a rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li1+, two Ti4+, and one Co+2.67+ atom. In the sixth O2- site, O2- is bonded to two equivalent Li1+, one Ti4+, and two Co+2.67+ atoms to form distorted OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramids that share a cornercorner with one OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, corners with five OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, a cornercorner with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid, edges with two equivalent OLi3TiCo2 octahedra, edges with four OLi2TiCo2 square pyramids, and an edgeedge with one OLi2TiCo2 trigonal bipyramid. The corner-sharing octahedral tilt angles are 17°.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-05. Materials Data on Li4Ti3(CoO4)3 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1306874

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗