Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1307083

Materials Data on Li2FeO2F by Materials Project

Abstract

Li2FeO2F is beta Polonium-derived structured and crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/c space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are four inequivalent Li1+ sites. In the first Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- and two equivalent F1- atoms to form LiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4F2 octahedra, corners with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, and edges with eight LiO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 3–12°. There are two shorter (2.05 Å) and two longer (2.18 Å) Li–O bond lengths. Both Li–F bond lengths are 2.20 Å. In the second Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- and two equivalent F1- atoms to form LiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4F2 octahedra, corners with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, and edges with eight LiO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 6–8°. There are two shorter (2.09 Å) and two longer (2.10 Å) Li–O bond lengths. Both Li–F bond lengths are 2.31 Å. In the third Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- and two equivalent F1- atoms to form LiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent LiO4F2 octahedra, corners with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, edges with four equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, and edges with eight LiO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–8°. There are two shorter (2.14 Å) and two longer (2.18 Å) Li–O bond lengths. Both Li–F bond lengths are 2.19 Å. In the fourth Li1+ site, Li1+ is bonded to four O2- and two equivalent F1- atoms to form LiO4F2 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4F2 octahedra, edges with six LiO4F2 octahedra, and edges with six equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 3–6°. There are two shorter (2.14 Å) and two longer (2.16 Å) Li–O bond lengths. Both Li–F bond lengths are 2.13 Å. Fe3+ is bonded to four O2- and two equivalent F1- atoms to form FeO4F2 octahedra that share corners with six LiO4F2 octahedra, edges with three equivalent FeO4F2 octahedra, and edges with nine LiO4F2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 2–12°. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.96–2.01 Å. There are one shorter (2.19 Å) and one longer (2.21 Å) Fe–F bond lengths. There are two inequivalent O2- sites. In the first O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two equivalent Fe3+ atoms to form OLi4Fe2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, corners with four OLi4Fe2 octahedra, edges with five equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, and edges with seven OLi4Fe2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–13°. In the second O2- site, O2- is bonded to four Li1+ and two equivalent Fe3+ atoms to form OLi4Fe2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, corners with four OLi4Fe2 octahedra, edges with five equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, and edges with seven OLi4Fe2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–10°. F1- is bonded to four Li1+ and two equivalent Fe3+ atoms to form FLi4Fe2 octahedra that share corners with two equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, corners with four OLi4Fe2 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FLi4Fe2 octahedra, and edges with ten OLi4Fe2 octahedra. The corner-sharing octahedra tilt angles range from 0–10°.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-06-04. Materials Data on Li2FeO2F by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1307083

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗