Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1307572

Materials Data on Li3Fe2(CuO4)2 by Materials Project

Abstract

Li3Fe2(CuO4)2 crystallizes in the triclinic P-1 space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded in a distorted square co-planar geometry to four O atoms. There are two shorter (2.09 Å) and two longer (2.10 Å) Li–O bond lengths. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to six O atoms to form LiO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Li–O bond distances ranging from 2.15–2.19 Å. In the third Li site, Li is bonded in a square co-planar geometry to four O atoms. There are two shorter (2.01 Å) and two longer (2.02 Å) Li–O bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Fe sites. In the first Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. There are a spread of Fe–O bond distances ranging from 1.89–2.22 Å. In the second Fe site, Fe is bonded to six O atoms to form FeO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra, edges with two equivalent FeO6 octahedra, and edges with two equivalent CuO6 octahedra. There are four shorter (1.99 Å) and two longer (2.16 Å) Fe–O bond lengths. There are two inequivalent Cu sites. In the first Cu site, Cu is bonded in a distorted square co-planar geometry to four O atoms. There is two shorter (1.87 Å) and two longer (1.88 Å) Cu–O bond length. In the second Cu site, Cu is bonded to six O atoms to form distorted CuO6 octahedra that share edges with two equivalent LiO6 octahedra and edges with four FeO6 octahedra. There are four shorter (1.87 Å) and two longer (2.47 Å) Cu–O bond lengths. There are four inequivalent O sites. In the first O site, O is bonded to three Li and two Fe atoms to form distorted OLi3Fe2 square pyramids that share corners with five equivalent OLi3Fe2 square pyramids and edges with four equivalent OLi2Fe2Cu square pyramids. In the second O site, O is bonded to two Li, two Fe, and one Cu atom to form distorted OLi2Fe2Cu square pyramids that share corners with five equivalent OLi2Fe2Cu square pyramids and edges with four equivalent OLi3Fe2 square pyramids. In the third O site, O is bonded in a distorted rectangular see-saw-like geometry to one Li, one Fe, and two Cu atoms. In the fourth O site, O is bonded in a 4-coordinate geometry to one Li, one Fe, and two Cu atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-05-03. Materials Data on Li3Fe2(CuO4)2 by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1307572

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗