Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1308131

Materials Data on LiGe by Materials Project

Abstract

Ge(Li) crystallizes in the tetragonal I4_1/amd space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are five inequivalent Li sites. In the first Li site, Li is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to four Li and eight Ge atoms. All Li–Li bond lengths are 2.87 Å. There are four shorter (2.72 Å) and four longer (2.88 Å) Li–Ge bond lengths. In the second Li site, Li is bonded to four Li and eight Ge atoms to form distorted LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, and faces with six equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra. Both Li–Li bond lengths are 2.70 Å. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.89 Å. In the third Li site, Li is bonded to four Li and eight Ge atoms to form distorted LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, and faces with six LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra. There are two shorter (2.70 Å) and two longer (2.87 Å) Li–Li bond lengths. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.89 Å. In the fourth Li site, Li is bonded to four Li and eight Ge atoms to form distorted LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, and faces with six LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra. Both Li–Li bond lengths are 2.70 Å. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.89 Å. In the fifth Li site, Li is bonded to four Li and eight Ge atoms to form distorted LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, edges with eight equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, faces with two equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, and faces with six LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra. There are two shorter (2.70 Å) and two longer (2.87 Å) Li–Li bond lengths. There are a spread of Li–Ge bond distances ranging from 2.86–2.89 Å. There are four inequivalent Ge sites. In the first Ge site, Ge is bonded to eight Li and four Ge atoms to form distorted GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra that share corners with four equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra, edges with sixteen LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, faces with four LiLi4Ge8 cuboctahedra, and faces with four equivalent GeLi8Ge4 cuboctahedra. All Ge–Ge bond lengths are 2.72 Å. In the second Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight Li and two equivalent Ge atoms. Both Ge–Li bond lengths are 2.86 Å. Both Ge–Ge bond lengths are 2.72 Å. In the third Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight Li and two equivalent Ge atoms. Both Ge–Li bond lengths are 2.72 Å. In the fourth Ge site, Ge is bonded in a 12-coordinate geometry to eight Li and two equivalent Ge atoms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2020-07-16. Materials Data on LiGe by Materials Project. https://doi.org/10.17188/1308131

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Cyclic moisture reactivation of calcium sorbents for long duration thermochemical energy storage

The transition to a flexible and reliable energy infrastructure, using electro-thermal energy generation technologies such as geothermal, concentrated solar power, and nuclear, usually demands simultaneous advancement of thermal energy storage (TES) to support on-demand electricity generation and industrial applications while mitigating the inherent intermittency of renewable energy sources and power outages from direct energy generation. Among TES technologies, thermochemical energy storage (TCES) based on calcium looping emerges as a compelling high-power energy storage candidate due to its high reaction enthalpy, compatibility with elevated operating temperatures, and abundance of low-cost materials. However, the long-term durability of calcium-based sorbents for TCES is hindered by surface sintering and particle aggregation, leading to performance degradation over repeated thermal cycles. This study explores a moisture hydration-based strategy to regenerate a degraded calcium sorbent and mitigate performance degradation for long duration TCES. The addition of moisture transforms calcium oxide into calcium hydroxide and produces intercalation water layers, associated with a regenerated surface area and reduced calcium oxide crystallite size. Both these effects are beneficial in restoring the sorbents' reactivity for carbonization. Additionally, an optimized hydration-assisted reactivation protocol balances the recovered energy storage capacity with heating penalty required for moisture removal from hydrated samples, resulting in an enhanced energy storage capacity up to 176% compared to benchmark sorbents that undergo cycling without reactivation after 60 cycles. In conclusion, these results highlight the potential of hydration-assisted reactivation to enhance the long-term performance of TCES, providing an effective pathway to advancing electro-thermal storage technologies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗