DOE OSTI · 1416287
Comparing Methods for Assessing Reliability Uncertainty Based on Pass/Fail Data Collected Over Time
Abstract
In this paper, we compare statistical methods for analyzing pass/fail data collected over time; some methods are traditional and one (the RADAR or Rationale for Assessing Degradation Arriving at Random) was recently developed. These methods are used to provide uncertainty bounds on reliability. We make observations about the methods' assumptions and properties. Finally, we illustrate the differences between two traditional methods, logistic regression and Weibull failure time analysis, and the RADAR method using a numerical example.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Abes, Jeff I., Hamada, Michael S., Hills, Charles R.. 2017-12-20. Comparing Methods for Assessing Reliability Uncertainty Based on Pass/Fail Data Collected Over Time. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2017.1417600
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.