DOE OSTI · 1440462
A thought experiment to evaluate a proposed data analysis method
Abstract
A statistical analysis was recently presented at a DOE review in reference to a particular problem. Here we attempt to capture the essence of this problem with a simple “toy” analog and demonstrate the incorrectness of the presented J figure of merit algorithm. We show that the incorrect usage of J gives PDFs that have erroneous long tails and significantly overestimate the rms deviations relative to those obtained by exact analytic methods. Conversely, a numerical Bayesian analysis gives the correct result.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Lestone, John Paul. 2018-05-30. A thought experiment to evaluate a proposed data analysis method. https://doi.org/10.2172/1440462
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.