Methodology for SNL Nuclear Facility Categorization

Bange, Marilyn S.; Schwinkendorf, William E.; Voss, Keith A.

doi:10.2172/1466887

Home/Archive/DOE OSTI

DOE OSTI · 1466887

Methodology for SNL Nuclear Facility Categorization

Bange, Marilyn S.·Schwinkendorf, William E.·Voss, Keith A.

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This administrative operating procedure (AOP) provides the process for performing the initial and final hazard categorization for a nuclear facility or activity to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 830.202. This AOP provides guidance on the application of the PHS process (refer to MN471017, Safety Basis Manual, Appendix NF-01,"Nuclear Facility Hazard Categorization") and describes the analyses that might be required to finalize a facility's hazard categorization.

Explore related subjects

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Bange, Marilyn S., Schwinkendorf, William E., Voss, Keith A.. 2016-08-24. Methodology for SNL Nuclear Facility Categorization. https://doi.org/10.2172/1466887

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

DOE OSTI2026

Ontologies for Intelligent Data Science

As anyone even vaguely aware of current technology can tell you, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) have made exceptional breakthroughs in recent years. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) emerged circa 2022 dominated by Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative tools for images emerged at about the same time.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗

DOE OSTI2026

Data Cards for Standardized Metadata Across DOE-Aligned Data Initiatives: Toward Transparent, Interoperable, and Governed Dataset Documentation

As data-intensive research, advanced computing, and artificial intelligence become increasingly central to scientific and operational workflows, the need for consistent, transparent, and machine-actionable documentation has grown correspondingly. Multiple DOE-aligned communities—including Office of Science, Genesis Mission, American Science Cloud (AmSC), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) stewardship and governance, and related cross-laboratory collaborations—have independently developed metadata practices to support discovery, access, reuse, repository deposit, and compliance.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗

DOE OSTI2026

Verification and Validation of Performance with Dissemination of Best Practices in District Energy and CHP for Enhanced Resiliency, Energy Efficiency, and Cybersecurity

This report contains the results of the International District Energy Association’s work to analyze, validate, and verify performance data of existing district energy systems and identify industy best practices for the purpose of improving system reliability, resiliency, and efficiency, and to accellerate decarbonization. In addition to a technical evaluation of the surveyed systems and identification of a series of technical performance metrics, the report illustrates the accompanying operations and financial best practices employed by surveyed systems to fully serve their customer base. Additionally, the third chapter of the report describes the current landscape of cybersecurity threats and counteracting measures, and recommends a series of steps for effectively guarding highly networked district energy systems against cybersecurity attacks.

96 KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND PRESERVATION↗