Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1475255

Solid Mechanics Code Verification: Contrasting Classical and Manufactured Reference Solutions

Abstract

Verification results for Sierra/SM using inexact reference solutions have often exhibited unsatisfactory convergence behavior. With an understanding of the convergence behavior for these types of tests, one can avoid falsely attributing pathologies of the test with incorrectness of the code. Simple theoretical results highlight that for an inexact reference solution two conditions must be met to observe asymptotic convergence. These conditions, and the resulting types of convergence behaviors, are further illustrated with graphical examples depicting the exact, inexact reference, and sequence of numerical solutions as vectors (in a function space). A stress concentration problem is adopted to contrast convergence behaviors when using inexact (classical linear elastic) and exact (manufactured) reference solutions. Convergence is not initially attained with the classical solution. Convergence with the manufactured solution indicates the convergence failure with the classical reference did not result from code error and provides insight on how for this problem asymptotic convergence could be attained with the classical reference solution by modifying the computational models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Cox, James V.. 2018-09-01. Solid Mechanics Code Verification: Contrasting Classical and Manufactured Reference Solutions. https://doi.org/10.2172/1475255

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗