DOE OSTI · 1495023
EMN 2B LTE Questionnaire Summary: Includes background and motivation, respondent demographics and summary of LTE questionnaire responses.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Ayers, Katherine, Roberts, George, Dinh, Huyen. 2019-02-06. 2018 LTE Questionnaire Summary. https://doi.org/10.11578/1495023
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The field of High-Performance Computing (HPC) is defined by providing computing devices with highest performance for a variety of demanding scientific users. The tight co-design relationship between HPC providers and users propels the field forward, paired with technological improvements, achieving continuously higher performance and resource utilization. A key device for system architects, architecture researchers, and scientific users are benchmarks, allowing for well-defined assessment of hardware, software, and algorithms. Many benchmarks exist in the community, from individual niche benchmarks testing specific features, to large-scale benchmark suites for whole procurements. We survey the available HPC benchmarks, summarizing them in table form with key details and concise categorization, also through an interactive website. For categorization, we present a benchmark taxonomy for well-defined characterization of benchmarks.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Manycore architectures are an energy-efficient step towards exascale computing within a constrained power budget. The Intel Knights Landing (KNL) manycore chip is a specific example of this and has seen early adoption by a number of HPC facilities. It is therefore important to understand the performance and energy usage characteristics of KNL. In this paper, we evaluate the performance and energy efficiency of KNL in contrast to the Xeon (Haswell) architecture for applications representative of the workload of users at NERSC. We consider the optimal MPI/OpenMP configuration of each application and use the results to characterize KNL in contrast to Haswell. As well as traditional DDR memory, KNL contains MCDRAM and we also evaluate its efficacy. Our results show that, averaged over our benchmarks, KNL is 1.84 × more energy efficient than Haswell and has 1.27 × greater performance.