Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1499041

Reactivity Feedback Modeling in SAM

Abstract

System Analysis Module (SAM) is being developed at Argonne National Laboratory as a modern system-level modeling and simulation tool for advanced non-light water reactor safety analyses. It utilizes the object-oriented application framework MOOSE to leverage the modern software environment and advanced numerical methods. The capabilities of SAM are being extended to enable the transient modeling, analysis, and design of various advanced nuclear reactor systems. This report presents the development of Point-Kinetics modeling and reactivity feedback mechanisms in SAM. It also presents a new capability for predicting the thermal expansion in various structural components by coupling SAM with an external thermomechanics module (Tensor Mechanics) from the MOOSE framework. The analysis of the transient behavior of a nuclear reactor requires the coupled simulation of reactor kinetics and thermal-hydraulics of the reactor core, especially for those unprotected transients where the reactor scram system may not function properly. The point kinetics model has been widely used for reactor safety analysis due to its simplicity to capture the transient behavior of the reactor. Various reactivity feedback models have been developed and integrated with the Point-Kinetics module, including fuel axial expansion, core radial expansion, fuel Doppler, and coolant density reactivity. The reactivity feedback models in SAM are similar to the respective models used in SAS4A/SASSYS-1. This report first presents the brief theory of the Point-Kinetics module and reactivity feedback models. A number of verification tests have been performed where the code simulations are compared to the analytical model results. The reactivity feedback due to the thermal deformation, such as the fuel axial expansion and core radial expansion, is important for SFR transient analysis. Simplified thermal expansion models for the fuel pin and reactor constrain system (e.g. grid plate) are developed and verified in SAM. Additionally, a coupling interface is developed to couple SAM with external thermomechanical analysis modules for more accurate predictions of the thermal expansion of different components during the transients. The current coupling interface has been tested with the Tensor Mechanics module from MOOSE. These point kinetics and reactivity feedback modeling capabilities have also been demonstrated by simulating the early stage of the unprotected loss-of-flow (ULOF) accident in the Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR). Both the stand-alone SAM and coupled SAM and Tensor Mechanics simulations are performed. It is confirmed that the major physics phenomena in the heat transport system of the ABTR reactor are captured by SAM, and the point kinetics model, reactivity feedback models, and the coupling schemes are working well as expected.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hu, G., Zhang, G., Hu, R.. 2019-02-01. Reactivity Feedback Modeling in SAM. https://doi.org/10.2172/1499041

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

ZiaCore Critical Experiment Demonstrates Key Technologies for Nuclear Energy Systems

ZiaCore is a LANL Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) project focused on developing and demonstrating key technologies for future nuclear energy systems. The project itself was split into three tasks: 1) Design of the ZiaCore Reactor, a UO2 fueled, graphite and zirconium-hydride (ZrH) moderated, heat pipe cooled micro-reactor 2) Development of the ZrH and heat pipes components 3) Performance of a critical experiment with a representative portion of the ZiaCore reactor incorporating the ZrH and heat pipes developed and made at LANL.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗

Operating Experience Data Analysis for Digital Instrumentation and Control System Reliability and Risk Assessment in Nuclear Power Plants

The implementation of advanced digital instrumentation and control (DI&C) systems in U.S. nuclear power plants (NPPs) can bring significant advancements in reliability, monitoring, and control capabilities. However, these systems also introduce new challenges, particularly in assessing risks such as common-cause failures (CCFs) and establishing robust reliability estimates for DI&C components. Addressing these challenges is critical for ensuring the safe and efficient operation of NPPs. Recently, Idaho National Laboratory was tasked by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to conduct a DI&C reliability study using operating experience data from the nuclear industry. The two operating experience data sources for the study are the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations’ Industry Reporting and Information System (IRIS) and the NRC’s Licensee Event Report database which is hosted at Idaho National Laboratory at https://lersearch.inl.gov/LERSearchCriteria.aspx. This report provides a comprehensive examination of DI&C systems, including their architecture, operational advantages, and associated challenges. It reviews existing industry DI&C studies and failure mode taxonomies, along with reliability data from various industries. Through a detailed analysis of these databases, the study provides insights into DI&C system performance. Considerations should be given to incorporate DI&C failure data into the NRC's Integrated Data Collection and Coding System and updating the Reliability and Availability Data System to support ongoing DI&C reliability studies. Recommendations are also provided for modeling DI&C reliability and CCF in probabilistic risk assessment, thereby supporting risk-informed decision-making and enhancing the reliability and safety of NPPs.

22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗