Deformation Mechanisms at Grain Boundaries in Polycrystals (Final Report)

Abstract

Despite its significance in polycrystalline materials, there have been few experimental investigations of the activity of grain boundary sliding (GBS) and the relationship between GBS and slip transmission at grain boundaries. This work addressed this knowledge gap by an experimental and analytical investigation into the interactions between grain boundary sliding (GBS) and slip transmission plastic deformation mechanisms, and how these are impacted by local microstructure. Polycrystalline columnar aluminum of 99.99% purity was examined as a highly modellable system for characterizing grain boundary-local deformation mechanism interaction. High-resolution, large field-of-view strain fields and grain orientation information were captured and statistically analyzed to identify deformation activity with respect to the local microstructure, using a combination of scanning electron microscopy and digital image correlation (SEM-DIC) with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). Alignment between the lower-resolution electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) data and the higher-resolution strain fields was significantly improved by clustering of strain data within an EBSD-defined boundary mantle. Although this work specifically focuses on characterizing the relationship between grain boundary sliding (GBS) and slip transmission, the developed experimental approach, multimodal data alignment process, and automated displacement discontinuity measurement process can be used to study a variety of mechanism interactions across a broad range of materials. Regarding GBS and slip transmission interaction, significant findings include that (1) grain boundaries that slide easily do not facilitate slip transmission; (2) substantial gradients in GBS magnitude could be found along the length of individual grain boundaries, and these were caused by strain discontinuities across the boundary related to deformation anisotropy between adjacent grains; (3) direct transmission and GBS were anti-compatible and facilitated by opposing boundary types (low misorientation and high energy grain boundaries respectively); (4) increased GBS activity was correlated with decreased indirect transmission behavior; (5) GBS accommodation at triple junctions was enabled by intragranular plasticity; and (6) the local intragranular plastic strain discontinuity between grains determined the magnitude of GBS gradients. The experimental strain fields were compared to that of a tangent crystal plasticity finite element (CPFE) model developed by collaborators (Mr. Ajey Venkataraman and Professor Michael Sangid, Purdue University). Implication of this work for improving CPFE models and deformation prediction are discussed. This work provides insight into the nature of these mechanisms and can be used to identify strain transfer criteria that can lead to improved GBS-sensitive crystal plasticity models.