Search NASA⌕ Search

DOE OSTI · 1631518

Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER): System Design Requirements: Trigger Unit

Abstract

One of the key systems required for the Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER) facility is the timely triggering of the Prompt System (PS). The Trigger Unit (TU) is the critical component that determines when the PS is to be triggered. There are two redundant TUs within the JASPER system, and each TU creates three redundant triggers for the PS. In this fashion, the Prompt Trigger System (PTS) can suffer the loss of one sensor, as well as the loss of one TU, and still function correctly. The TU is designed to receive signals from five separate sensors along the flight of the projectile on its way to the target. The TU uses three pairs of these detectors to create a trigger pulse at the appropriate time, based on the actual velocity of the projectile as it passes between the two sensors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hunt, Dave N.. 2020-05-19. Joint Actinide Shock Physics Experimental Research (JASPER): System Design Requirements: Trigger Unit. https://doi.org/10.2172/1631518

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related reports

Large language models for transportation research: Methodologies, state of the art, and future opportunities

The rapid rise of large language models (LLMs) is transforming transportation research, with significant advancements emerging between 2023 and 2025, a period marked by the inception and swift growth of adopting and adapting LLMs for various transportation applications. Despite these significant advancements, however, a systematic review and synthesis of the existing literature remains lacking. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of the methodologies and applications of LLMs in transportation. We explore key applications, including autonomous driving, travel behavior prediction, and general transportation-related queries, alongside LLM methodologies such as zero- or few-shot learning, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning. From the review, critical research gaps are identified. From the methodological perspective, many of the research limitations can be addressed by integrating LLMs with existing tools and refining LLM architectures. From the application perspective, research opportunities for LLMs to address various transportation challenges are also explored. By synthesizing these findings, this review not only presents the state-of-the-art LLM adoption and adaptation in transportation, but also proposes future research directions as well as insights and recommendations for policymakers and practitioners, paving the way for greater LLM-driven research innovations in transportation in the future.

42 ENGINEERING↗